首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月08日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Threshold concepts and sustainability: features of a contested paradigm
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Philip A. Loring
  • 期刊名称:FACETS
  • 印刷版ISSN:2371-1671
  • 电子版ISSN:2371-1671
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:5
  • 页码:182-199
  • DOI:10.1139/facets-2019-0037
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Canadian Science Publishing
  • 摘要:Threshold concepts describe the core concepts that people must master if they are to effectively think from within a new discipline or paradigm. Here, I discuss threshold concepts relevant to the science and practice of sustainability, unpacking the persistent challenges and critiques that sustainability has faced over the decades. Sustainability is immensely popular, but also endlessly critiqued as being naïve, vague, and easy to co-opt. I argue that these challenges can be traced to sustainability’s status as a robust, alternative world view to the industrial, neoliberal paradigm. The threshold concepts discussed below are troublesome, and new learners face significant challenges when trying to learn them and move into the paradigm. Here, I review five threshold concepts that are widely discussed as important to sustainability: complexity, collaborative institutions, multiple ways of knowing, no panaceas, and adaptability. This list is not intended as comprehensive but exemplary of sustainability as a pluralistic paradigm. Recognizing the special status of these and other threshold concepts within sustainability, and the linkages and dependencies among them, is an important advance for sustainability education and practice. I also offer some suggestions on classroom activities that have proved effective in helping people through the process of learning these concepts.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有