首页    期刊浏览 2026年01月03日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Classical or Gravity? Which trade model best matches the UK facts?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Minford, Patrick ; Xu, Yongdeng
  • 期刊名称:Cardiff Economics Working Papers / Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School
  • 印刷版ISSN:1749-6101
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 期号:10
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Cardiff University
  • 摘要:We examine the empirical evidence bearing on whether UK trade is governed by a Classical model or by a Gravity model, using annual data from 1965 to 2015 and the method of Indirect Inference which has very large power in this application. The Gravity model here differs from the Classical model in assuming imperfect competition and a positive effect of total trade on productivity. We found that the Classical model passed the test rather easily, and that the Gravity model did so too but at a rather lower level of probability. As the gravity elements are strengthened the model's probability falls and vice versa. The two models' policy implications are also similar.
  • 关键词:Bootstrap;indirect inference;gravity model;classical trade model;UK trade
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有