首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月22日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A Critical Analysis of Participatory Rural Appraisal in Social Research: Challenges for Validity and Reliability of Field Data
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Majid Hussain Alias Ghalib Hussain ; Aneeqa Ansari ; Muhammad Akram
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education
  • 电子版ISSN:1308-5581
  • 出版年度:2022
  • 卷号:14
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:4788-4795
  • DOI:10.9756/INT-JECSE/V14I2.534
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education
  • 摘要:The accuracy of results in social research is based on the sharpness of data collection tools.For long the researchers have been using traditional tools such as questionnaire survey, case study method, projective methods,etc.,but inthe recent past, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools have emerged as a new research method. NGOs and some Government Institutions have now adopted PRA and Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) tools aselements of their institutional culture and are increasingly used in social research. In agricultural extension, the researchers used PRA for the identification of research priorities, a field problem, training needs assessment, infrastructure facility availability,etc. This article is a criticismofPRAin the light of personal research experience conducted in 2013 on Maternal and Newborn Child Health (MNCH)project wherein PRA tools including Transect Walk, Social Mapping, Focused Group Discussions(FGDs), Networking Diagram, and Cause and Effect Diagram were used. The first three activities were found to be continuous repetition. The researchers’ negative role was observed as they kept on directing the respondents; hence the purpose of the PRA method was notbeing fulfilled.In the group activity,people hesitate to provide sensitive data; hence originality of data is challenged. Marginalized people were the target groups, but the elite of the area had more representation. There were gaps between the environment of the training session for the application of PRA tools and field activity for the collection of data through PRA tools. The procedures and protocol of PRA could not be followed.During FGD twelve people were invited, but in reality, more than fifty persons were present, which affected the efficiency of researchers and quality of data. Hencethe prime objectof PRA was not achieved.
  • 关键词:PRA;Facilitator;Validity;Reliability;Data;NGO;Field Research
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有