首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月06日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Field Evaluation of Mercury Vapor Analytical Methods: Comparison of the "Double Amalgam Method" and ISO 17733
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Mitsutoshi TAKAYA ; Jee Yeon JOENG ; Nobuo ISHIHARA
  • 期刊名称:Industrial Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:0019-8366
  • 电子版ISSN:1880-8026
  • 出版年度:2006
  • 卷号:44
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:287-290
  • DOI:10.2486/indhealth.44.287
  • 出版社:National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
  • 摘要:In this study, a gold amalgam method called the "Double amalgam method" was compared with the ISO 17733 method for mercury vapor analysis method. In terms of sensitivity and ease of operation, the amalgamation method is superior to the oxidation method. Two parallel samplings were carried out in this research at a button battery factory, where the mercury vapor level in the air was about 0.001 mg/m3 and at a fluorescent lamp factory, where the mercury vapor level was about 0.015 mg/m3. In the both cases, the measured values of the two showed good agreement with each other. As these two workplaces represent typical mercury levels in industries today, the double amalgam method is applicable to working environment measurement.
  • 关键词:Mercury;Mercury vapor;Workplace air;Gold amalgam;Double amalgam;Hopcalite®;ISO 17733
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有