首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月03日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The “cognitive neuroscience revolution” is not a (Kuhnian) revolution. Evidence from scientometrics
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Eugenio Petrovich ; Marco Viola
  • 期刊名称:Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
  • 印刷版ISSN:2239-2629
  • 出版年度:2022
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:142-156
  • DOI:10.4453/rifp.2022.0013
  • 语种:German
  • 出版社:Mimesis Edizioni
  • 摘要:Fueled by the rapid development of neuroscientific tools and techniques, some scholars consider the shift from traditional cognitive psychology toward cognitive neuroscience to be a revolution (most notably Boone and Piccinini). However, the term “revolution” in philosophy of science can easily be construed as involving a paradigm shift in the sense of Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Is a Kuhnian account sound in the case at hand? To answer this question, we consider heuristic indicators of two features of paradigm shifts: the incommensurability of ontologies; and a gap between scientific communities. Based on our evidence, we argue that no revolution has occurred (at least, not yet).
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有