摘要：The erratum concerns Figs. 2 and B.2. in the original publication (Panopoulou et al. 2022). While the convolution described in Appendix B was done correctly, with beam sizes corresponding to the different selected distances, a mistake was found when converting the resulting radial profiles from angular to physical units. This last conversion was done assuming the distances of 260 pc, 423 pc and 762 pc, which led to an artificial ‘stretching’ of the radial axis. We have now corrected this error, by assuming the original distance of 140 pc when converting the radial profile to units of pc. Figures 2 and B.2 have been updated and are shown here. We thank Philippe André for pointing out this error.
