The author is asserting that this is a philosophical paper regarding time. But at least to me it is difficult to see that this work conveys any new information or perspective to the reader. Strictly speaking, it is nothing but a garrulous monologue which could be summarized in only two sentences; biological or subjective time is different from physical or objective time, and so we must not confuse them when we give a client the Rorschach test. On the other hand, we can see some interesting suggestions in the last part of this paper. The author claims that if we pay more attention to the biological or subjective time of the client, we will be able to make the Rorschach test stricter, and furthermore use this test as a means of curing a client. Though an interesting idea, there is no concrete description. I would like to know in detail about these points. So I strongly recommend rewriting.