There are various attempts to recycle organic waste. Formerly, most of organic waste have recycled naturally in ecosystem and agricultural society. But, at the present day, especially in urban cities, such kinds of attempts have different problems to realize. Hence we need the diverse verification of the attempts. Meanwhile, some autonomies have just started to see the attempts as objects of administrative evaluation. In recent years, our society is becoming more complex. We conceive that we need an effective evaluation method which can handle multi-frames, multi-criteria, and multi-subjects. Especially recycling system, such as recycling system of organic waste, have to be evaluated from various points of view, for example, environment, education, autonomy, economy, and health. And in order to work the system, it is necessary to consider diverse subjects who support the system actually, besides the accountability will be demanded (See Horie and Hagihara 2003, 2004). In this study, we discuss some cases of administrative evaluation of wards in Tokyo, which treat recycling system, organic waste recycling particularly. We inspect the cases from the view of treatment of multi-frames, multi-criteria, multi-subjects, then, we show the present problem for future improvement. Consequently, we found some problems, that is to say, how the evaluation sheets reflect the purpose of evaluation, how the contents should be judged, whether the indexes are appropriate, how the external evaluation should be slot into the sheets, few description about negative aspects, and the like. Finally, we suggest that the evaluation sheets should be drew up through external deliberations which include experts, vested interests (stakeholder) and citizens.

JEL classification : D7, D8, Q5, R5