期刊名称：ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies
印刷版ISSN：1492-9732
出版年度：2008
卷号：7
期号：2
页码：239-259
语种：English
出版社：ACME: Eine internationale Internet-Zeitschrift für kritische Geographie
摘要：Conventional informed consent guidelines as exemplified by Canada’s 16 research ethics policy statement and applied by Institutional Research Boards 17 (IRBs) presuppose an individuated liberal humanist research subject that is 18 incommensurate with the subjectivities of many actual research participants as they 19 experience them, and as the theoretical perspectives used in much qualitative 20 research conceptualise them. I use the example of my ethnographic research in 21 northern Pakistan to demonstrate that abiding by IRB guidelines for informed 22 consent would have the effect of disciplining and normalising both my research 23 participants and my research. Based on my own research experiences I suggest four guiding practices for informed consent in community centred research: that it 1 be collective, progressive, oral, and negotiated. The paper ends by stressing the 2 importance of examining research ethics policies and procedures as a way to reflect 3 critically on the disciplining and normalising institutional context within which our 4 research practices and outcomes are shaped.
关键词：informed consent;research ethics;Institutional Research Boards;liberal humanist research; research participants;ethnographic research;normalization
