首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月26日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Testing the difference between experts’ and lay people’s landscape preferences
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Tiziano Tempesta ; Daniel Vecchiato
  • 期刊名称:Aestimum
  • 印刷版ISSN:1592-6117
  • 电子版ISSN:1724-2118
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 期号:66
  • 页码:1-41
  • DOI:10.13128/Aestimum-16481
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Aestimum
  • 摘要:The European Landscape Convention, ratified by 40 nations, has placed emphasis on the necessity that the value of the landscape is assessed by the population. However it is standard practice that a few experts decide which areas are of landscape interest and the transformations that are compatible with their conservation. To compare the landscape preferences of experts and lay people a study was done on the Po Delta Natural Park (Italy) using a psychophysical approach. In our case study the average scores of experts and lay people are not very different. However it was also ascertained that the experts evaluate the presence of some elements in a way that differs from lay people. As the responsibility for landscape policies is normally devolved to a few experts it would appear necessary that the preferences and opinions of lay people should always be carefully analysed.
  • 其他摘要:The European Landscape Convention, ratified by 40 nations, has placed emphasis on the necessity that the value of the landscape is assessed by the population. However it is standard practice that a few experts decide which areas are of landscape interest and the transformations that are compatible with their conservation. To compare the landscape preferences of experts and lay people a study was done on the Po Delta Natural Park (Italy) using a psychophysical approach. In our case study the average scores of experts and lay people are not very different. However it was also ascertained that the experts evaluate the presence of some elements in a way that differs from lay people. As the responsibility for landscape policies is normally devolved to a few experts it would appear necessary that the preferences and opinions of lay people should always be carefully analysed.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有