首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月21日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Ethics for the Living World Alternative Methods and New Strategies for The Protection of Nonhuman Animals
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Susanna Penco ; Rosagemma Ciliberti
  • 期刊名称:Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism
  • 印刷版ISSN:2280-9643
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:1
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:49-65
  • DOI:10.7358/rela-2013-002-penc
  • 出版社:LED Edizioni Universitarie
  • 摘要:The use of animals in laboratories is a controversial issue involving much dispute between the researchers who support animal experimentation and those who are in favor of its abolishment.The former, whilst criticizing the emotional behavior of those who oppose it, consider experimentation on animals unavoidable, whereas the latter criticize animal experiments and the underlying logic as erroneous considering its methods unscientific and therefore misleading.This paper stems from the idea of researching into possible ways of developing or improving new alternative strategies for animal experimentation by finding adequate solutions beyond dogmatic opposition in the context of the current European Directive 2010/63/EU (the main reference point for the experimentation on animals) for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes .More specifically the paper aims at offering the readers a working proposal, while duly respecting the protocol for the post mortem donation of their own corpses for the purposes of study and research.As we believe diseases need to be cured and not only treated, we are advocating post mortem studies on organs which could lead to the discovery of the causes of unknown etiological pathologies.The commitment to the implementation of constantly new and innovative alternatives concerning animal experimentation is right and proper, especially in the light of the enormous debt which the Italian National Bioethics Committee stated that mankind has towards nonhuman living beings.
  • 其他摘要:The use of animals in laboratories is a controversial issue involving much dispute between the researchers who support animal experimentation and those who are in favor of its abolishment. The former, whilst criticizing the emotional behavior of those who oppose it, consider experimentation on animals unavoidable, whereas the latter criticize animal experiments and the underlying logic as erroneous considering its methods unscientific and therefore misleading. This paper stems from the idea of researching into possible ways of developing or improving new alternative strategies for animal experimentation by finding adequate solutions beyond dogmatic opposition in the context of the current European Directive 2010/63/EU (the main reference point for the experimentation on animals) for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes . More specifically the paper aims at offering the readers a working proposal, while duly respecting the protocol for the post mortem donation of their own corpses for the purposes of study and research. As we believe diseases need to be cured and not only treated, we are advocating post mortem studies on organs which could lead to the discovery of the causes of unknown etiological pathologies. The commitment to the implementation of constantly new and innovative alternatives concerning animal experimentation is right and proper, especially in the light of the enormous debt which the Italian National Bioethics Committee stated that mankind has towards nonhuman living beings.
  • 关键词:Philosophy; Ethology; Medicine;;Animal experiments; animal ethics; animal use; alternative methods; ethics committee; post mortem body donations; human tissue and human organ donation; corpse didactics; animal protection; multiple sclerosis.
  • 其他关键词:Animal experiments;animal ethics;animal use;alternative methods;ethics committee;post mortem body donations;human tissue and human organ donation;corpse didactics;animal protection;multiple sclerosis.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有