期刊名称：Matraga - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da UERJ
印刷版ISSN：2446-6905
出版年度：2014
卷号：21
期号：34
DOI：10.12957/matraga.2014.17506
语种：Portuguese
出版社：Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
摘要：One of the most common criticisms against Saussure’s theory claims that it negates the historicity of language; language is allegedly thought of as an object without historical dimension, considered as a self-sufficient system. This text aims at showing that this conclusion is founded on a poor reading of the Course in General Linguistics. What Saussure does in his theory of sign is to radically separate language from reality. He posits that the organization of reality is different from the organization of language, because language is not a reflex of the reality, but a human creation. As such, it is radically historical. History is integrated into Saussure’s theory by means of the concept of value; in other words, under the primacy of form. This paper shows what it means to analyze language historicity under the primacy of form.
其他摘要：One of the most common criticisms against Saussure’s theory claims that it negates the historicity of language; language is allegedly thought of as an object without historical dimension, considered as a self-sufficient system. This text aims at showing that this conclusion is founded on a poor reading of the Course in General Linguistics. What Saussure does in his theory of sign is to radically separate language from reality. He posits that the organization of reality is different from the organization of language, because language is not a reflex of the reality, but a human creation. As such, it is radically historical. History is integrated into Saussure’s theory by means of the concept of value; in other words, under the primacy of form. This paper shows what it means to analyze language historicity under the primacy of form.
关键词：valor;historicidade;ordem da linguagem;ordem da realidade.;value;historicity;organization of language;reality organization.
