摘要：Normal 0 21 false false false PT-BR X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} In this paper we propose to unravel the “prior recognition of the other” as a fundamental non-epistemic condition of the researches in education, avoiding certain problems caused by reification, that is, the attitude of not recognizing the knowledge of otherness. Based on the reflections of Axel Honneth, we observed the existence of a fundamental instance: underlying the perspective of knowledge there is a nonepistemic condition that can be oriented by the motives of others. It is, therefore, a proposal that shuns away from the dispute between different epistemological perspectives and the polarization or counterpoint among subjective and objective elements, both reified. To assume the recognition of the other implies, finally, the recognition of its otherness through its existence in fullness. In this aspect, Honneth’s theory comes to fill a gap in the case of the educational researches, because we could even risk saying that, without this acceptance of the other, any initiative would be subjected to fall into the nets of reification.
其他摘要：In this paper we propose to unravel the “prior recognition of the other” as a fundamental non-epistemic condition of the researches in education, avoiding certain problems caused by reification, that is, the attitude of not recognizing the knowledge of otherness. Based on the reflections of Axel Honneth, we observed the existence of a fundamental instance: underlying the perspective of knowledge there is a nonepistemic condition that can be oriented by the motives of others. It is, therefore, a proposal that shuns away from the dispute between different epistemological perspectives and the polarization or counterpoint among subjective and objective elements, both reified. To assume the recognition of the other implies, finally, the recognition of its otherness through its existence in fullness. In this aspect, Honneth’s theory comes to fill a gap in the case of the educational researches, because we could even risk saying that, without this acceptance of the other, any initiative would be subjected to fall into the nets of reification.
