出版社：Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
摘要：This article attempts to demonstrate that Book II in Aristotle’s Politics is not simply pars destruens in Aristotelic doctrine.The author has reconstructed the first theory of power in history by gathering, ordering and systematizing the diverse critics to Plato or Faleas, as well to the constitutions of Crete, Lacedaemonia and Cartago↓This article attempts to demonstrate that Book II in Aristotle’s Politics is not simply pars destruens in Aristotelic doctrine.The author has reconstructed the first theory of power in history by gathering, ordering and systematizing the diverse critics to Plato or Faleas, as well to the constitutions of Crete, Lacedaemonia and Cartago.↓This article attempts to demonstrate that Book II in Aristotle’s Politics is not simply pars destruens in Aristotelic doctrine.The author has reconstructed the first theory of power in history by gathering, ordering and systematizing the diverse critics to Plato or Faleas, as well to the constitutions of Crete, Lacedaemonia and Cartago.
其他摘要：This article attempts to demonstrate that Book II in Aristotle’s Politics is not simply pars destruens in Aristotelic doctrine. The author has reconstructed the first theory of power in history by gathering, ordering and systematizing the diverse critics to Plato or Faleas, as well to the constitutions of Crete, Lacedaemonia and Cartago.
