首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月22日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:NARRATIVE REVIEW ARTICLE: EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM EVALUATION MODEL, FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE NEW THEORIES
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:AHMADY SOLEIMAN ; AKBARI LAKEH MARYAM ; ESMAEILPOOR SIMIN
  • 期刊名称:RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION
  • 印刷版ISSN:2322-2719
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:3
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:5-8
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • 摘要:

    Introduction: This study is focused on common theories that influenced the history of program evaluation and introduce the educational program evaluation proposal format based on the updated theory.
    Methods: Literature searches were carried out in March-December 2010 with a combination of key words, MeSH terms and other free text terms as suitable for the purpose. A comprehensive search strategy was developed to search Medline by the PubMed interface, ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) and the main journal of medical education regarding current evaluation models and theories. We included all study designs in our study. We found 810 articles related to our topic, and finally 63 with the full text article included. We compared documents and used expert consensus for selection the best model.
    Results: We found that the complexity theory using logic model suggests compatible evaluation proposal formats, especially with new medical education programs. Common components of a logic model are: situation, inputs, outputs, and outcomes that our proposal format is based on. Its contents are: title page, cover letter, situation and background, introduction and rationale, project description, evaluation design, evaluation methodology, reporting, program evaluation management, timeline, evaluation budget based on the best evidences, and supporting documents.
    Conclusion: We found that the logic model is used for evaluation program planning in many places, but more research is needed to see if it is suitable for our context.

  • 关键词:EVALUATION MODELS; LOGIC MODEL; EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION THEORIES
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有