首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月28日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Automaticity in subtractions depends on problem-size
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Alejandro J. Estudillo ; Estefania Bermudo Romero ; Nerea Casado
  • 期刊名称:Anales de Psicología
  • 印刷版ISSN:0212-9728
  • 电子版ISSN:1695-2294
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:31
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:697-704
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Universidad de Murcia
  • 摘要:The evidence showing that simple multiplications and additions can be solved by direct retrieval is considerable. However evidence about division and subtraction is less compelling. By using a ―cross-operation interference paradigm‖ the present research explores whether subtraction problems can be retrieved without intention and the role of operands‘ problem-size in this process. Sixty-two participants decided whether the displayed addition was correct or not. In ―false additions problems‖ the answer could be the result of the subtractions of the addends (e.g., 7 + 4 = 3) or an unrelated number (e.g., 7 + 4 = 5). Results showed an interference effect, that is, more errors and slower response times in subtraction related problems than in unrelated problems. More importantly, this effect was restricted to small problems (7 + 4 = 3 vs. 7 + 4 = 5), whereas no differences were found for large problems (14 + 8 = 6 vs. 14 + 8 = 7). These results suggest that small subtractions can be retrieved directly as multiplications, questioning a traditional dissociation between operations. We argue that, depending on individual experience, the same representation and processes can be involved in solving additions, subtractions and multiplications.
  • 其他摘要:The evidence showing that simple multiplications and additions can be solved by direct retrieval is considerable. However evidence about division and subtraction is less compelling. By using a ―cross-operation interference paradigm‖ the present research explores whether subtraction problems can be retrieved without intention and the role of operands‘ problem-size in this process. Sixty-two participants decided whether the displayed addition was correct or not. In ―false additions problems‖ the answer could be the result of the subtractions of the addends (e.g., 7 + 4 = 3) or an unrelated number (e.g., 7 + 4 = 5). Results showed an interference effect, that is, more errors and slower response times in subtraction related problems than in unrelated problems. More importantly, this effect was restricted to small problems (7 + 4 = 3 vs. 7 + 4 = 5), whereas no differences were found for large problems (14 + 8 = 6 vs. 14 + 8 = 7). These results suggest that small subtractions can be retrieved directly as multiplications, questioning a traditional dissociation between operations. We argue that, depending on individual experience, the same representation and processes can be involved in solving additions, subtractions and multiplications.
  • 关键词:Subtractions; automaticity; problem-size; arithmetic problem solving
  • 其他关键词:Subtractions; automaticity; problem-size; arithmetic problem solving
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有