首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月21日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of an Enlarged Version of the Parental Bonding Instrument
  • 作者:Luigi Cappelli ; Valeria Verrastro ; Irene Petruccelli
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy
  • 印刷版ISSN:1577-7057
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:15
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:219-228
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Universidad de Almería
  • 摘要:Factorial structure and criterion validity of an enlarged version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI-E) were evaluated in a community sample of young adults. This enlarged version was obtained by adding parental favouritism (FAV) and put-down/shaming (PUT_D) to the original care and overprotection (OV) scales as recalled by the offspring. Factor analysis suggested a Àve factor model as the best solution, identifying CARE, FAV and PUT_D and splitting the overprotection items into two factors, denial of psychological autonomy (DPA) and discouragement of behavioural freedom, (DBF) with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from .77 to .92. These Àve scales were correlated with depression and anxiety of the offspring, measured by BDI and STAI. Both of them correlated negatively with care and positively with the other parental scales, as expected by Parker’s theory on the role of affectionless control for the psychopathological vulnerability of the children. A series of hierarchical regression analyses, including CARE, DPA and DBF at the Àrst step and FAV and PUT_D at the second step, showed that the latter enhanced the predictive power of the instrument. Overall these Àndings: (1) suggest a Àve factor structure for the PBI-E and (2) conÀrm the criterion validity of the PBI scales in respect to children’s depression and anxiety, providing also compelling evidence for the incremental validity of Gilbert’s scales.
  • 其他摘要:Factorial structure and criterion validity of an enlarged version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI-E) were evaluated in a community sample of young adults. This enlarged version was obtained by adding parental favouritism (FAV) and put-down/shaming (PUT_D) to the original care and overprotection (OV) scales as recalled by the offspring. Factor analysis suggested a Àve factor model as the best solution, identifying CARE, FAV and PUT_D and splitting the overprotection items into two factors, denial of psychological autonomy (DPA) and discouragement of behavioural freedom, (DBF) with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from .77 to .92. These Àve scales were correlated with depression and anxiety of the offspring, measured by BDI and STAI. Both of them correlated negatively with care and positively with the other parental scales, as expected by Parker’s theory on the role of affectionless control for the psychopathological vulnerability of the children. A series of hierarchical regression analyses, including CARE, DPA and DBF at the Àrst step and FAV and PUT_D at the second step, showed that the latter enhanced the predictive power of the instrument. Overall these Àndings: (1) suggest a Àve factor structure for the PBI-E and (2) conÀrm the criterion validity of the PBI scales in respect to children’s depression and anxiety, providing also compelling evidence for the incremental validity of Gilbert’s scales.
  • 关键词:PBI; favouritism; put-down/shaming scales; criterion validity of PBI.
  • 其他关键词:PBI; favouritism; put-down/shaming scales; criterion validity of PBI.
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有