首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月16日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Mariana Guerra ; Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes ; Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho
  • 期刊名称:RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea
  • 印刷版ISSN:1415-6555
  • 电子版ISSN:1982-7849
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:19
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:270-289
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
  • 摘要:This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their th eoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study ; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, wh ich undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.
  • 其他摘要:This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their th eoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study ; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, wh ich undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.
  • 关键词:Public administration; case study; qualitative research; method.
  • 其他关键词:Public administration; case study; qualitative research; method.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有