首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月18日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations Measured with Two Instruments Using Scheimpflug Camera System
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Choi, Yeon Jung ; Kang, Na Hee ; Jun, Roo Min
  • 期刊名称:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:0378-6471
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:56
  • 期号:10
  • 页码:1497-1504
  • DOI:10.3341/jkos.2015.56.10.1497
  • 语种:Korean
  • 出版社:The Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 摘要:Purpose

    To compare the corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of normal young subjects using Galilei™ G4 (Zeimer, Port, Switzerland) and Pentacam® (Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany).

    Methods

    Corneal HOAs were measured using Galilei™ G4 and Pentacam® in 41 healthy individuals (41 eyes). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained to evaluate the repeatability of the 2 devices. Differences in HOAs between the 2 instruments were analyzed with a paired t -test and correlations evaluated.

    Results

    All ICCs measured using Galilei™ G4 and Pentacam® showed more than moderate repeatability (>0.81) except trefoil, tetrafoil, 4th and 5th HOAs. When comparing the measurements obtained with Galilei™ G4 and Pentacam®, total HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), secondary astigmatism and 5th total HOAs were statistically significantly different between the 2 device (all p ≤ 0.001). In addition, Galilei™ G4 and Pentacam® showed discrepancy among all corneal HOAs items. Although the total corneal HOAs and the SA were significantly correlated, other HOA measurements generally exhibited a low correlation.

    Conclusions

    Corneal HOAs obtained by the 2 instruments cannot be used interchangeably due to their differences and discrepancy although corneal HOAs measured using Galilei™ G4 and Pentacam® showed relatively high repeatability.

  • 关键词:Corneal higher-order aberrations; Galilei™ G4; Pentacam®
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有