摘要：This comment focuses on Harel’s argument of principle against the privatization of the state’s institutions of criminal punishment and of war-making. After summarizing what I take to be the core of that argument, I consider two objections as a way of suggesting that there is something missing in the way he makes the case against privatization. I then propose a different and more compelling sort of argument against the privatization of criminal punishment, based on a republican theory of government that Harel embraces elsewhere in the book.
其他摘要：This comment focuses on Harel’s argument of principle against the privatization of the state’s institutions of criminal punishment and of war-making. After summarizing what I take to be the core of that argument, I consider two objections as a way of suggesting that there is something missing in the way he makes the case against privatization. I then propose a different and more compelling sort of argument against the privatization of criminal punishment, based on a republican theory of government that Harel embraces elsewhere in the book.
关键词：Law; Legal Studies; Law and Society; Interdisciplinary Research; History; Philosophy; Literature; Rhetoric; Psychology; Cultural Studies; Sociology; Criminology; Economics; Politics; Government; Geography
