首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月13日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Durão, Ana Paula Reis ; Morosolli, Aline ; Pittayapat, Pisha
  • 期刊名称:Imaging Science in Dentistry
  • 印刷版ISSN:2233-7822
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:45
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:213-220
  • DOI:10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.213
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
  • 摘要:Purpose

    The aim this study was to compare the accuracy of orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists in identifying 17 commonly used cephalometric landmarks, and to determine the extent of variability associated with each of those landmarks.

    Materials and Methods

    Twenty digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were evaluated by two groups of dental specialists, and 17 cephalometric landmarks were identified. The x and y coordinates of each landmark were recorded. The mean value for each landmark was considered the best estimate and used as the standard. Variation in measurements of the distance between landmarks and measurements of the angles associated with certain landmarks was also assessed by a subset of two observers, and intraobserver and interobserver agreement were evaluated.

    Results

    Intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent for intraobserver agreement, but only good for interobserver agreement. The least reliable landmark for orthodontists was the gnathion (Gn) point (standard deviation [SD], 5.92 mm), while the orbitale (Or) was the least reliable landmark (SD, 4.41 mm) for dentomaxillofacial radiologists. Furthermore, the condylion (Co)-Gn plane was the least consistent (SD, 4.43 mm).

    Conclusion

    We established that some landmarks were not as reproducible as others, both horizontally and vertically. The most consistently identified landmark in both groups was the lower incisor border, while the least reliable points were Co, Gn, Or, and the anterior nasal spine. Overall, a lower level of reproducibility in the identification of cephalometric landmarks was observed among orthodontists.

  • 关键词:Cephalometry; Analysis; Anatomic landmarks; Orthodontics; Reliability and validity
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有