首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月23日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Limits between Extrapositions and Right-Dislocations
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Laetitia Leonarduzzi et Sophie Herment
  • 期刊名称:Cercles : Revue Pluridisciplinaire du Monde Anglophone
  • 电子版ISSN:1292-8968
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 期号:29
  • 页码:46-66
  • 出版社:Université de Rouen
  • 摘要:It is often said that, like NPs, clauses which are phrasal cannot (or can rarely) undergo extraposition. It is especially the case for instance of nominal –ing clauses. Except when introduced by such embedding predicates as be no use, be worth, these clauses are not considered as extraposable 1 . Quirk et al. (1985) for example think that the sentence It's fun(,) being a hostess is unlikely to contain an extraposition (even though this is one possible interpretation). Rather, they consider the –ing clause here as a noun-phrase tag (or right- dislocation). Huddleston (1984) gives the following extraposed example as ungrammatical or doubtful: .It has caused many of us great distress seeing him treat her like that (whereas it would be fne with an infnitive clause). The author deems the extraposition of –ing clauses to be nevertheless possible in short sentences (It's been nice meeting you; it was useful having her with us ). Smolka (2005) and Kaltenb.ck (2004), for their part, show that with –ing clauses, contrary to what happens with the other nominal clauses (that, infnitive), extraposition is the marked structure. Non-extraposition is more frequent than extraposition. So it seems that extraposition is indeed rather rare, and found mainly with certain embedding predicates
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有