摘要：In “What if the Earth is Flat: Working With, Not Against, Faculty Concerns About Grammar in Student Writing,” Daniel Cole relates the story of a faculty development workshop gone awry. A session on responding to student work—meant to introduce the commenting philosophies fundamental to writing studies—became derailed when faculty failed to accept the orthodoxy of deemphasizing grammar and sentence-level concerns in favor of global issues, such as content development, elaboration, and arrangement. As Cole notes, such conflicts between writing studies’ principles and the beliefs of faculty in the disciplines are common.
