首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月19日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Is There a Development Gap in Rationality?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Alexander W. Cappelen ; Shachar Kariv ; Erik Ø Sørensen
  • 期刊名称:Discussion Papers / Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration
  • 印刷版ISSN:0804-6824
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:2014
  • 出版社:Bergen
  • 摘要:We report an experimental test of the four touchstones of rationality in choiceunder risk – utility maximization, stochastic dominance, expected-utility maximizationand small-stakes risk neutrality – with students from one of the bestuniversities in the United States and one of the best universities in Africa, theUniversity of Dar es Salaam. Although the US and the Tanzanian subjects comefrom different backgrounds and face different economic prospects, they are unitedby being among the most able in their societies. Importantly, many of whom willexercise an outsized influence over economic and political affairs. We find verysmall or no significant differences between the two samples in the degree of rationalityaccording to a number of standard economic measures. An alternativeapproach is to take cognitive ability (IQ) as a proxy for economic rationality. Weshow that a canonical IQ test indicates a much larger development gap in rationalityrelative to our economic tests.
  • 关键词:Development; rationality; revealed preference; stochastic dominance;expected utility; risk aversion; cognitive ability; experiment
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有