文章基本信息

标题：Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches
本地全文：下载
作者：Yoojin Kwon ; Michelle Lemieux ; Jill McTavish 等
期刊名称：Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
印刷版ISSN：0025-7338
出版年度：2015
卷号：103
期号：4
页码：184-188
DOI：10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.004
出版社：Medical Library Association
摘要：Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness of different options for de-duplicating records retrieved from systematic review searches.
Methods
Using the records from a published systematic review, five de-duplication options were compared. The time taken to de-duplicate in each option and the number of false positives (were deleted but should not have been) and false negatives (should have been deleted but were not) were recorded.
Results
The time for each option varied. The number of positive and false duplicates returned from each option also varied greatly.
Conclusion
The authors recommend different de-duplication options based on the skill level of the searcher and the purpose of de-duplication efforts.
关键词：Biomedical Research; Standards; Duplicate Publication as Topic; Publications; Standards; Review Literature as Topic