摘要：A tanulm¨¢ny hat, az egykori Pannonia provincia ter¨¹let¨¦n tal¨¢lhat¨® lel.hely 5¨C6. sz¨¢zadra keltezhet. ker¨¢mia ed¨¦nyeinek archeometriai vizsg¨¢lati eredm¨¦nyeit tartalmazza. A lel.helyek k.z¨¹l h¨¢rom temet. (Kajdacs, Sz¨®l¨¢d, Tam¨¢si), h¨¢rom pedig telep¨¹l¨¦s (Balatonlelle, Ordacsehi, Zam¨¢rdi). A vizsg¨¢latok sor¨¢n els. sorban petrogr¨¢fiai elemz¨¦st, a 9. petrogr¨¢fiai csoport mint¨¢in kat¨®dlumineszcens mikroszk¨®pi¨¢t, egy mint¨¢n (151.1/48.13) pedig SEM-EDX vizsg¨¢latot alkalmaztunk. A kutat¨¢s els.dleges c¨¦lja a korszak ed¨¦nytechnol¨®gi¨¢j¨¢nak felt¨¦rk¨¦pez¨¦se, azon bel¨¹l pedig f.k¨¦nt a sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨¢si technik¨¢k elk¨¹l.n¨ªt¨¦se volt. A vizsg¨¢latok sor¨¢n 11 csoportot lehetett elk¨¹l.n¨ªteni a sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨¢s t¨ªpusa alapj¨¢n. A legnagyobb mennyis¨¦gben m¨¦szk. t.rmel¨¦ket tartalmaz¨® sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨¢s fordult el. (4. csoport), amellyel f.k¨¦nt a k¨¹l.nb.z. t¨ªpus¨² fazekakat sov¨¢ny¨ªtott¨¢k. A ker¨¢mi¨¢khoz felhaszn¨¢lt m¨¦szk. feltehet.en helyi vagy k.zeli geol¨®giai lel.helyr. l sz¨¢rmazik, hasonl¨®an a szint¨¦n sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨¢sk¨¦nt megfigyelhet. homokhoz (3. csoport), homokk.h.z (5. csoport), illetve kvarcithoz (10. csoport). Ezen k¨ªv¨¹l t.bb olyan sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨® anyag t¨ªpust figyelt¨¹nk meg, amelyek nem fordulnak el. a lel. helyek k.zvetlen k.rnyezet¨¦ben. Ilyen t¨ªpus a m¨¢rv¨¢nyt.rmel¨¦ket (8. csoport), a bazaltt.rmel¨¦ket (6. csoport), az andezit t.rmel¨¦ket (7. csoport), illetve a metamorf k. zett.rmel¨¦ket (9. csoport) tartalmaz¨® ed¨¦nyek csoportja. Ezekn¨¦l a nyersanyagokn¨¢l felmer¨¹l az import lehet.s¨¦ge. Mindegyik lel.helyen v¨¢ltozatos sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨® anyagok ker¨¹ltek felhaszn¨¢l¨¢sra, ¨¦s csaknem minden petrogr¨¢fiai csoportba h¨¢rom, vagy ann¨¢l t.bb lel.helyr. l sz¨¢rmaz¨® ed¨¦nyek tartoznak. A k¨¹l.nb.z. sov¨¢ny¨ªt¨® anyag t¨ªpusok nem k¨¹l.n¨¹lnek el aszerint, hogy temet. b. l vagy s¨ªrb¨®l el.ker¨¹l. ed¨¦nyhez haszn¨¢lt¨¢k-e fel .ket
其他摘要：Our study contains the results of the archaeometrical examination of six archaeological sites from the 5¨C6thcentury AD located in the territory of the former province Pannonia (three cemeteries: Kajdacs, Sz¨®l¨¢d, Tam¨¢si; three settlements: Balatonlelle, Ordacsehi, Zam¨¢rdi). During our work we mainly used ceramic petrographic analysis, although in some cases (samples from Group 9) we had a chance to carry out cathodoluminescence microscopy (CL) and on one sample (151.1/48.13) electron probe microanalysis (SEM-EDX) as well. The main aim of this study is to give preliminary information on the pottery technology of this period, focusing on different types of tempering techniques. During the examination 11 groups were defined based on tempering techniques. The most common technique was tempering with limestone fragments (Group 4), which was usually used for various types of pots. The limestone, which was used for these ceramics probably arises from the vicinity of the examined archaeological sites, as well as sand (Group 3), sandstone (Group 5) and quartzite (Group 10) tempering material. Furthermore, there are certain tempering raw materials that may not originate from the direct vicinity of the archaeological sites, such as tempering with marble (Group 8), basalt (Group 6), andesite (Group 7) and metamorphic rock fragments. These raw materials might be defined as import products. Varied types of tempering were observed at each site, and almost every petrographic group contains ceramics from three or more archaeological sites. The different types of tempering are not characteristic of the type of the site i.e. of settlements or cemeteries
