摘要：State conservation units and environmental protection areas, legally instituted by the Brazilian government follow two principles: biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. They are territorial physical spaces categorized by the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) full protection communities and units of sustainable use. The task forces composed by the audit courts of the member states of Brazil which focuses on analyzing issues related to sustainability, considered this classification, with emphasis on the institutional scope, having on one side the environmental and social politics and on the other side, the management system. As a basis for understanding what was denominated as Stakeholder’s Relationship Management (SRM), it was used the Stakeholders’ Theory, once it has the purpose of evaluating the actions of organizations and the claims of stakeholders on economic, social and environmental dimensions, vis-à-vis the state conservation units, as well as environmental protection areas. Considering this purpose in relation to the sustainable development of the Amazon, the Brazilian government to emphasize the lined model, more on future environmental issues than in the immediate ones, contributed to the replacement of the environmental model for the developmental one. Based on these assumptions, this article assesses the contribution of the work done by the audit courts as supervisors of management in established conservation units, in the light of theoretical contribution and legislation, both in the environmental and in operational audits. It is evidenced that the interaction between the several stakeholders involved in the conservation units management, specifically, Rondônia – one of the federation states – and the extent to which this work contributes to the Amazon biodiversity protection, the region where it is inserted, and its sustainable usage. “Data Mining technique” was used to do so, whose results show that the 40 units of conservation existing in Rondônia are helping to protect the environment. Therefore, as a result of this study, it was evidenced the fragility on the management of this conservation units, inhibiting benefits for the biodiversity and it was still verified the low interaction between stakeholders involved in the conservation units management. For future studies, it is suggested to verify the materialization or non-materialization by the stakeholders of the recommendations given by the Audit Court Collegiate, what is its reflex to the conservation units existing in the federation states which are inserted in into the Amazon Forest
