首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月25日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of Uncertainty Between Traditional and Alternative Methods for Food Microbiological Analysis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Alyexandra Arienzo ; Francesca Losito ; Ottavia Stalio
  • 期刊名称:American Journal of Food Technology
  • 印刷版ISSN:1557-4571
  • 电子版ISSN:1557-458X
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:11
  • 期号:1-2
  • 页码:29-36
  • DOI:10.3923/ajft.2016.29.36
  • 出版社:Academic Journals Inc., USA
  • 摘要:The objectives highlighted in the present study were to determine the estimates of measurement uncertainty associated with microbiological analysis in food samples performing a gage repeatability and reproducibility study on three different microbiological methods of analysis for the detection and quantification of total coliforms; Plate count method, 3M PetrifilmTM count plates method and the MBS method. For all three methods the contribution the total gage R and R is less than 10%, demonstrating the ability to accurately evaluate the concentration of total coliforms in food samples. However, the repeatability and reproducibility follows the tendency; Plate count method<3M PetrifilmTM count plates methodTM count plates methods while for the MBS method it does not significantly affect the measure. Together these results demonstrate that greater repeatability and reproducibility are connected to a more simple analytical procedure demonstrating that uncertainty is certainly related to the amount of manual work and the individual interpretation of results. Results confirm that it is important to diminish these sources of error reducing labor and simplifying procedures and increasing automation.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有