首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月23日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of Responses to Endotracheal Intubation Using an Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway according to the Insertion Time during Induction with Sevoflurane
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Hahm, Tae Soo ; Kim, Jie Ae
  • 期刊名称:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
  • 印刷版ISSN:2005-6419
  • 出版年度:2004
  • 卷号:46
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:264-268
  • DOI:10.4097/kjae.2004.46.3.264
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists,
  • 摘要:Background

    This study was performed to compare responses to the insertion of an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and to the intubation of an endotracheal tube according to insertion time when used with sevoflurane and without muscle relaxant.

    Methods

    We used 50% N2O-O2-8% sevoflurane and a 10% topical lidocaine spray. Forty-eight patients were randomized into four groups according to insertion time (each, n = 12). The ILMA was inserted at 3, 4, 5, and 6 minutes after sevoflurane induction and intubation was performed at 1 minute after ILMA insertion. Responses to intubation, such as vital signs, jaw relaxation, coughing, biting, movements, and laryngospasm were compared according to ILMA insertion time.

    Results

    At 3 minutes, overall responses to insertion and intubation were worse than at 4, 5, and 6 minutes (P < 0.05). At 4, 5, and 6 minutes, responses to the insertion of the ILMA and the intubation of endotracheal tube were satisfactory.

    Conclusions

    Insertion of ILMA at 4 minutes after sevoflurane induction proved satisfactory, and this could be applied in clinical practice.

  • 关键词:Intubating laryngeal mask airway; sevoflurane
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有