摘要：Under the provisions of the Fiscal procedure code (Government Ordinance no. 92/2003), the courts, especially the High Court of Cassation and Justice, developed a rigid jurisprudence in the fiscal field. The petitioners were not recognised the right to address the court for the recognition of their rights, if the preliminary complaints were not answered by the administrative body in the legal time limit. The courts claimed that only the decision that solved the preliminary complaint may be contested, or, in case the solution was delayed, the petitioner can only obtain in court a decision summoning the fiscal administrative authority to answer the preliminary complaint. A series of cases is analysed and arguments are given against the final solutions of the courts, in the spirit of a good administration and harmonisation of the fiscal procedure with the general administrative procedure described by Law no. 554/2004. The arguments sustain the recent changes in the field of contestation of fiscal administrative acts, introduced by the new Fiscal procedure code (Law no. 207/2015)that will enter into force on January 1st 2016.
