摘要：The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the last decade's psycholinguistic
research on how syntactic functions are assigned during on-line language comprehension
in German. In a language like German, the assignment of syntactic functions is not an easy
task due to the pervasive morphological syncretism within the nominal System. Inspired by
the work of Frazier (1987) on Dutch, research on German started with the question äs to
how the parser copes with ambiguous filler-gap dependencies in subject-object ambiguities.
Work on this question quickly established a rather general subject-object preference in
German subject-object ambiguities. Having established such a subject-object preference,
several new lines of research emerged. We will review the three major lines that are
currently in the focus of interest: (i) Besides subject-object ambiguities involving filler-gap
dependencies, there are subject-object äs well äs object-object ambiguities which are only
ambiguous with respect to case assignment. When these latter kinds of ambiguities where
included in experimental studies, it soon became clear that case features play a role which
cannot be reduced to phrase-structural configurations. (ii) Garden-path effects that are
found when a locally ambiguous sentence is disambiguated in favor of a non-preferred
reading have been shown to differ widely in strength. Investigating why this is so is now a
major topic both in psycholinguistics in general and in experimental work on German in
particular. (iii) The finding of subject-object-preferences might at least in certain cases be
due to semantic/pragmatic factors instead of syntactic ones. Several experiments have now
been conducted which manipulated some semantic/pragmatic property of test Stimuli in
order to disentangle syntactic from semantic/pragmatic contributions to observable
preferences.
