首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Being a legal guardian – the nursing perspective
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Michael Kuniavsky ; Ilana Kadmon ; David Chinitz
  • 期刊名称:Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
  • 印刷版ISSN:2045-4015
  • 电子版ISSN:2045-4015
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:59
  • DOI:10.1186/s13584-015-0056-1
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Surrogate decision making is common in public healthcare worldwide. In Israel any incompetent adult patient requires a Legal Guardian (LG), appointed by the court, for approval of invasive none-life saving procedures. Usually, the LG is a close family member of the patient. Nurses are the most available healthcare providers to the families and the LG during the process of appointment and afterwards. The patient's family is often anxious or even depressed, and thus the perceptions and behavior of nurses charged with providing support are crucial. In a previous study based on interviews of LGs we found that the most difficult issues for the LGs were decision related issues, family related issues and appointment bureaucracy issues. To qualitatively assess nurses attitudes regarding the difficulties that families and LGs face during and after appointments and to compare the findings to previously accessed LG attitudes. After IRB approval, demographic and semi-structured questionnaires were used to assess the attitudes of a convenience sample of 34 nurses who were participating in a critical care training course (41 % of the respondents were from the ICU, 47 % from medical or surgical wards, and 12 % from other departments at secondary and tertiary hospitals in Israel.) regarding LGs difficulties. After reading and analyzing the responses provided by the nurses, the authors categorized the pertinent topics raised using content analysis. Nurses' perceptions were also compared to those of LGs reported in previous research by the authors. Three main themes emerged: 1. Decision related issues; namely coping with the complexity of end of life decision issues; 2. Family related issues; namely, family dynamics related to the various decisions regarding LG identity and patient care; and 3. Bureaucracy issues; namely, the formal process related to LG appointment and decisions. Regarding the first two themes, the feelings of the nurse respondents were quite similar to those of LG respondents from our earlier research. The third theme - bureaucracy issues – was never mentioned by the nurses, as opposed to LGs who mentioned it frequently. This suggests that the nurses did not consider it to be an important issue. The difficulties of decision making as well as family support and responsibility of LGs are well known by nurses. The appointment and bureaucracy issues were neglected by nurses, although they are very important to the LGs. Improvement of this parameter of care is needed. Possible directions for improvement include raising awareness of nurses regarding the appointment process and alleviation of bureaucracy. Further research is required to identify appropriate strategies for improving these aspects of care.
  • 关键词:Legal guardian ; Nurses ; Surrogate decision making ; Qualitative research
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有