Background: Displacing the use of polluting and inefficient cookstoves in developing countries is necessary to achieve the potential health and environmental benefits sought through clean cooking solutions. Yet little quantitative context has been provided on how much displacement of traditional technologies is needed to achieve targets for household air pollutant concentrations or fuel savings.

Objectives: This paper provides instructive guidance on the usage of cooking technologies required to achieve health and environmental improvements.

Methods: We evaluated different scenarios of displacement of traditional stoves with use of higher performing technologies. The air quality and fuel consumption impacts were estimated for these scenarios using a single-zone box model of indoor air quality and ratios of thermal efficiency.

Results: Stove performance and usage should be considered together, as lower performing stoves can result in similar or greater benefits than a higher performing stove if the lower performing stove has considerably higher displacement of the baseline stove. Based on the indoor air quality model, there are multiple performance–usage scenarios for achieving modest indoor air quality improvements. To meet World Health Organization guidance levels, however, three-stone fire and basic charcoal stove usage must be nearly eliminated to achieve the particulate matter target (< 1–3 hr/week), and substantially limited to meet the carbon monoxide guideline (< 7–9 hr/week).

Conclusions: Moderate health gains may be achieved with various performance–usage scenarios. The greatest benefits are estimated to be achieved by near-complete displacement of traditional stoves with clean technologies, emphasizing the need to shift in the long term to near exclusive use of clean fuels and stoves. The performance–usage scenarios are also provided as a tool to guide technology selection and prioritize behavior change opportunities to maximize impact.

Citation: Johnson MA, Chiang RA. 2015. Quantitative guidance for stove usage and performance to achieve health and environmental targets. Environ Health Perspect 123:820–826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408681

Address correspondence to M.A. Johnson, 2124 Kittredge St., #57, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA. Telephone: (510) 649-9355. E-mail: mjohnson@berkeleyair.com

We thank D. Pennise, C. Garland, D. Charron, M. Kaur, D. Alexander, J. Ipe, and S. Mehta for their help in developing this paper. We also thank K. Smith and A. Pillarisetti for their assistance with the household air pollution exposure–response curve.

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Received: 12 May 2014 Accepted: 25 March 2015 Advance Publication: 27 March 2015 Final Publication: 1 August 2015

Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehp508@niehs.nih.gov . Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Note to readers with disabilities: EHP has provided a 508-conformant table of contents summarizing the Supplemental Material for this article (see below) so readers with disabilities may determine whether they wish to access the full, nonconformant Supplemental Material. If you need assistance accessing this or any other content on this site, please contact ehp508@niehs.nih.gov . Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Supplemental Table of Contents PDF (135 KB)