首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月08日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Institutionality: “Institution” and “Institutions Matter”
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Jan-Erik Lane
  • 期刊名称:Open Journal of Political Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:2164-0505
  • 电子版ISSN:2164-0513
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:04
  • 期号:01
  • 页码:23-30
  • DOI:10.4236/ojps.2014.41004
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Scientific Research Publishing
  • 摘要:Theories of institutions have become very popular in the social sciences. Thus, we often encounter the claim “Institutions Matter” in the new literature, which is called “institutionalism”. It is time to make a critique of this theme, asking what an institution is and what it “matters” for. “Institution” stands for two very different sorts of entities in social reality—rules and organisations—and the new institutionalism comes in two corresponding versions, economic or atomistic neo-institutionalism against sociological or holistic neoinstitutionalism. The notion of new logic of individual behaviour—a logic of appropriateness—is flawed, as it is not in agreement with basic notions in the philosophy of action.
  • 关键词:“Institution” as Term; Institution as Rule or Norm; Institutionalisation as Enforcement of a Rule; Agency; Institutions as Organisations; Outcomes of Institutions; Economic Neo-Institutionalism; Sociological Neo-Institutionalism; EU Institutions; Motivation as Incentives and Beliefs about Rules
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有