首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Price discrimination in two-sided markets
  • 其他标题:Price discrimination in two-sided markets
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Zhang, Kai ; Liu, Weiqi
  • 期刊名称:South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:2222-3436
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:19
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-17
  • DOI:10.17159/2222-3436/2016/v19n1a1
  • 出版社:University of Pretoria
  • 摘要:The use of a price discrimination strategy is an important tool in competition. It can hurt firms and benefit consumers in a one-sided market. However, in two-sided markets, its primary goal is to attract more agents or increase profits. Here, the performance of a second-degree price discrimination strategy in the context of duopoly two-sided platforms is analysed. Two exogenous variables, which include the discount rate and the price discrimination threshold, are used in order to examine whether the price discrimination strategy could help two-sided platforms achieve their objective, which is to maximise their market value. Three cases are considered, and we demonstrate that the price discrimination strategy cannot attract more agents and at the same time increase the profits; a lower price discrimination threshold cannot ensure larger markets shares; a higher discount rate is detrimental to the profit of a platform. However, this is good for its market shares. Moreover, discriminative pricing increases the competition.
  • 其他摘要:The use of a price discrimination strategy is an important tool in competition. It can hurt firms and benefit consumers in a one-sided market. However, in two-sided markets, its primary goal is to attract more agents or increase profits. Here, the performance of a second-degree price discrimination strategy in the context of duopoly two-sided platforms is analysed. Two exogenous variables, which include the discount rate and the price discrimination threshold, are used in order to examine whether the price discrimination strategy could help two-sided platforms achieve their objective, which is to maximise their market value. Three cases are considered, and we demonstrate that the price discrimination strategy cannot attract more agents and at the same time increase the profits; a lower price discrimination threshold cannot ensure larger markets shares; a higher discount rate is detrimental to the profit of a platform. However, this is good for its market shares. Moreover, discriminative pricing increases the competition.
  • 其他关键词:price discrimination;two-sided market;cross-network externality;price discrimination threshold
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有