首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月05日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:M. Alexis Kirk ; Caitlin Kelley ; Nicholas Yankey
  • 期刊名称:Implementation Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 电子版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:11
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1
  • DOI:10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Background In 2009, Damschroder et al. developed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which provides a comprehensive listing of constructs thought to influence implementation. This systematic review assesses the extent to which the CFIR’s use in implementation research fulfills goals set forth by Damschroder et al. in terms of breadth of use, depth of application, and contribution to implementation research. Methods We searched Scopus and Web of Science for publications that cited the original CFIR publication by Damschroder et al. (Implement Sci 4:50, 2009) and downloaded each unique result for review. After applying exclusion criteria, the final articles were empirical studies published in peer-review journals that used the CFIR in a meaningful way (i.e., used the CFIR to guide data collection, measurement, coding, analysis, and/or reporting). A framework analysis approach was used to guide ion and synthesis of the included articles. Results Twenty-six of 429 unique articles (6 %) met inclusion criteria. We found great breadth in CFIR application; the CFIR was applied across a wide variety of study objectives, settings, and units of analysis. There was also variation in the method of included studies (mixed methods ( n = 13); qualitative ( n = 10); quantitative ( n = 3)). Depth of CFIR application revealed some areas for improvement. Few studies ( n = 3) reported justification for selection of CFIR constructs used; the majority of studies ( n = 14) used the CFIR to guide data analysis only; and few studies investigated any outcomes ( n = 11). Finally, reflections on the contribution of the CFIR to implementation research were scarce. Conclusions Our results indicate that the CFIR has been used across a wide range of studies, though more in-depth use of the CFIR may help advance implementation science. To harness its potential, researchers should consider how to most meaningfully use the CFIR. Specific recommendations for applying the CFIR include explicitly justifying selection of CFIR constructs; integrating the CFIR throughout the research process (in study design, data collection, and analysis); and appropriately using the CFIR given the phase of implementation of the research (e.g., if the research is post-implementation, using the CFIR to link determinants of implementation to outcomes).
  • 关键词:Implementation research ; Theory ; Frameworks ; Synthesis ; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有