摘要：Background This study aimed to document the variation in technical efficiency of primary care (PC) practices in delivering evidence-based cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) and to identify associated factors. Methods This observational study was based on the follow-up measurements in a cluster randomized trial. Patients were recruited from 41 general practices in the Netherlands, involving 106 GPs and 1671 patients. Data on clinical performance were collected from patient records. The analysis focused on PC practices and used a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Bias-corrected DEA technical efficiency scores for each PC practice were generated, followed by regression analysis with practice efficiency as outcomes and organizational features of general practice as predictors. Results Not all PC practices delivered recommended CVRM with the same technical efficiency; a significant difference from the efficient frontier was found ( p < .000; 95 % CI 1.018–1.041). The variation in technical efficiency between PC practices was associated with training practice status ( p = .026). Whether CVRM clinical tasks were performed by a practice nurse or a GP did not influence technical efficiency in a statistical significant way neither did practice size. Conclusions Technical efficiency in delivering evidence-based CVRM increased with having a training practice status. Nurse involvement and practice size showed no statistical impact.
关键词：Primary care ; Cardiovascular risk management ; Technical efficiency ; Data envelopment analysis
