期刊名称：International Journal of Health Policy and Management
电子版ISSN：2322-5939
出版年度：2014
卷号：3
期号：2
页码：57-62
DOI：10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61
语种：English
出版社：Kerman University of Medical Sciences
其他摘要：Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access public preferences remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens’ Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is derived, its application in healthcare, and critique the information it can provide for decision-makers. We conclude that combining deliberation of an informed public via CJs and quantification of preferences using DCE methods, whilst it remains to be tested as an approach to engaging the public in priority-setting, could potentially achieve much richer information than the application of either method in isolation.
其他关键词：Consumer Participation ; Health Policy ; Decision-Making ; Public Preferences ; Citizens’ Jury (CJ) ; Discrete ; Choice Experiment (DCE)
