首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月23日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Sterling, Joanna ; Jost, John T. ; Pennycook, Gordon
  • 期刊名称:Judgment and Decision Making
  • 印刷版ISSN:1930-2975
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:11
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:352-360
  • 出版社:Society for Judgment and Decision Making
  • 摘要:We conducted additional analyses of Pennycook et al.’s (2015, Study 2) data to investigate the possibility that there would be ideological differences in “bullshit receptivity†that would be explained by individual differences in cognitive style and ability. As hypothesized, we observed that endorsement of neoliberal, free market ideology was significantly but modestly associated with bullshit receptivity. In addition, we observed a quadratic association, which indicated that ideological moderates were more susceptible to bullshit than ideological extremists. These relationships were explained, in part, by heuristic processing tendencies, faith in intuition, and lower verbal ability. Results are inconsistent with approaches suggesting that (a) there are no meaningful ideological differences in cognitive style or reasoning ability, (b) simplistic, certainty-oriented cognitive styles are generally associated with leftist (vs. rightist) economic preferences, or (c) simplistic, certainty-oriented cognitive styles are generally associated with extremist (vs. moderate) preferences. Theoretical and practical implications are briefly addressed.
  • 关键词:political ideology; neoliberalism; cognitive style; cognitive ability; bullshit receptivity
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有