首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Asymmetric GARCH Value-at-Risk over MSCI in Financial Crisis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Han Ching Huang ; Yong-Chern Su ; Jen-Tien Tsui
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
  • 电子版ISSN:2146-4138
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:390-398
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:EconJournals
  • 摘要:This paper uses four asymmetric GARCH models, which are GJR-GARCH, NA-GARCH, T-GARCH, and AV-GARCH to compare their performance on VaR forecasting to the symmetric GARCH model. In addition, we adopt four different mean equations which are ARMA(1,1), AR(1), MA(1), and “in-mean” to find out a more appropriate GARCH method in estimating VaR of MSCI World Index in financial crisis. We pick up 900 daily information of MSCI World Index from 2006 to 2009.We find that GARCHM(1,1) in mean, MA-GARCHM(1,1), AR(1)-T-GARCHM(1,1), and ARMA(1,1)-T-GARCHM(1,1) outperform other models in terms of number of violations. ARMA(1,1)-T-GARCHM(1,1) performs the best in terms of mean violation range, mean violation percentage, aggregate violation range, aggregate violation percentage, and max violation range. Other than T-GARCH models, number of violations decrease by using in-mean or MA(1) mean equation. Generally speaking, the better the performance in terms of violation, the larger the capital requirement is needed. Keywords : market risk; value-at-risk; GARCH; MSCI; financial crisis JEL Classification : G2; G21
  • 其他摘要:This paper uses four asymmetric GARCH models, which are GJR-GARCH, NA-GARCH, T-GARCH, and AV-GARCH to compare their performance on VaR forecasting to the symmetric GARCH model. In addition, we adopt four different mean equations which are ARMA(1,1), AR(1), MA(1), and “in-mean” to find out a more appropriate GARCH method in estimating VaR of MSCI World Index in financial crisis. We pick up 900 daily information of MSCI World Index from 2006 to 2009.We find that GARCHM(1,1) in mean, MA-GARCHM(1,1), AR(1)-T-GARCHM(1,1), and ARMA(1,1)-T-GARCHM(1,1) outperform other models in terms of number of violations. ARMA(1,1)-T-GARCHM(1,1) performs the best in terms of mean violation range, mean violation percentage, aggregate violation range, aggregate violation percentage, and max violation range. Other than T-GARCH models, number of violations decrease by using in-mean or MA(1) mean equation. Generally speaking, the better the performance in terms of violation, the larger the capital requirement is needed. Keywords : market risk; value-at-risk; GARCH; MSCI; financial crisis JEL Classification : G2; G21
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有