首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月01日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Community–University Partnerships for Research and Practice: Application of an Interactive and Contextual Model of Collaboration
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Heather J. Williamson ; Belinda-Rose Young ; Nichole Murray
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement
  • 印刷版ISSN:1534-6102
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:20
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:55-84
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:University of Georgia
  • 摘要:Community–university partnerships are frequently used to enhance translational research efforts while benefiting the community. However, challenges remain in evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the utility of applying the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration to a translational research education program, the Institute for Translational Research in Adolescent Behavioral Health, to guide programmatic efforts and future evaluations. Institute stakeholders from academia and the community completed in-depth interviews querying their expectations and experiences in this collaboration. Key quotes and themes were extracted and analyzed based on the constructs within the 3 phases of the model. The findings note specific themes for future evaluations. Overall, the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration proved a useful framework to guide the process evaluation of the Institute. Findings suggest possible strategies for the successful development, evaluation, and sustainability of community–university partnerships.
  • 其他摘要:Community–university partnerships are frequently used to enhance translational research efforts while benefiting the community. However, challenges remain in evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the utility of applying the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration to a translational research education program, the Institute for Translational Research in Adolescent Behavioral Health, to guide programmatic efforts and future evaluations. Institute stakeholders from academia and the community completed in-depth interviews querying their expectations and experiences in this collaboration. Key quotes and themes were extracted and analyzed based on the constructs within the 3 phases of the model. The findings note specific themes for future evaluations. Overall, the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration proved a useful framework to guide the process evaluation of the Institute. Findings suggest possible strategies for the successful development, evaluation, and sustainability of community–university partnerships.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有