Early Modern Zoology: The Construction of Animals in Science, Literature and the Visual Arts.
Macinnes, Ian
Karl A. E. Enenkel and Paul J. Smith, eds. Early Modern Zoology:
The Construction of Animals in Science, Literature and the Visual Arts.
2 vols. Intersections Yearbook for Early Modern Studies 7. Leiden:
Brill, 2007. xxvii + 648 pp. index. illus. bibl. $205. ISBN:
978-90-04-13188-0.
Like other volumes of the Yearbook for Early Modern Studies (three
were published in 2007 after a short hiatus), this one offers a fine
international collection of essays on a topic of growing interest to
Renaissance and early modern studies. In the past fifteen years, zoology
has ceased to be the sole province of historians of science, and the
increasing interdisciplinarity of animal studies is attested in the
makeup of this edition. Of the nineteen contributors, eight are art
historians and six literary scholars. The international flavor is also
particularly appropriate to the subject matter, since zoological
discourse itself has always crossed national boundaries. Although this
is mostly an English-language edition, the contributors are drawn from
across the Western world and a certain multilingual competence is
presumed in the reader. Two of the essays are in German; one is in
French.
Overall, the work both benefits from and is challenged by
developments in early modern scholarship on animals. In their short
introduction the editors are quick to distance the collection from the
traditional history of ideas, with its teleological emphasis on
development and progress. This is a battle that has already been won in
cultural and literary studies, which have long recognized that animal
discourse is not simply part of an increasingly understood natural world
but rather, as Harriet Ritvo puts it, an "unacknowledged
metonymy" for human concerns (The Animal Estate, 1990). But it is a
battle that I suspect still needs to be fought in the history of ideas.
Not only do the essays happily refuse to paint with the broad strokes of
progress, they also avoid some of the pitfalls of older scholarship on
animals which occasionally degenerated into lists of the appearance of a
certain animal in various genres or the appearance of animals in the
works of a single author. Instead these essays focus either on a
specific work such as Franzius's Historia animalium sacra (Vibeke
Roggen) or on a narrowly defined genre such as Northern European game
pieces (Sarah Cohen). In each case the conclusions are highly specific
to the work or genre in question. The result in this collection (as in
others on the topic) is that the essays are incredibly diverse, and the
editors are at some pains to create an appearance of unity. They achieve
this unity in part by organizing the material but also by making sure
that the collection represents a balanced approach to the animal kingdom
itself, with an equal number of essays on "mammals,"
"birds," "fishes," "insects," and
"lower organized animals." These categories, while not
identical to those employed by the early moderns, do indicate the
evenhandedness of the edition. In the end, however, the editors
acknowledge that despite its length the collection can only offer
"a glimpse of the intriguing variety of discourses on animals"
and that it should serve mainly to "stimulate further
research" (12).
A particular strength of the collection is its focus on the visual
arts. One of the three sections is devoted to "zoological
illustration," four essays from the rest of the work depend almost
entirely on visual material, and, of course, the majority of
contributors are art historians. Their subject matter is represented not
only in black-and-white figures set into the essays but also
occasionally duplicated in a separate section of glossy color plates.
These increase the visual appeal of the edition considerably. Many of
the essays on the arts are directly concerned with the emerging question
of scientific representation itself and in the relationship between text
and image. Ultimately, as Rebecca Parker Brienen concludes, drawings
represent "distinct visual responses to the challenge of naturalism in zoological representation" (312).
In a collection as varied as this one, readers are bound to be
frustrated from time to time, although perhaps for different reasons.
Those with backgrounds in literary scholarship and cultural studies, for
example, may consider some of the essays undertheorized or at least
understated. In any emerging field, description is important enough that
it sometimes eclipses analysis. The longest single essay, Johan
Koppenol's careful seventy-eight pages of animals in Dutch poetry,
concludes by saying only that "many poems can be found which
contain information about the place and role of animals in daily
life," and that these poems also offer "information about how
people perceived nature" (525-26). On the other hand, it is
possible that some might find a shorter and more forcefully argued essay
such as Suzanne Walker's fine piece on the hunting treatise to be
underdeveloped. The collection's attitude toward sources may also
divide readers. Pride of place is given to primary sources (the only
items to appear in the brief index), and most of essays are very close
to the archival work that grounds them. They make few references to
recent scholarship. Some readers of Renaissance Quarterly may find this
feature refreshing and appropriate given the field; others may be
frustrated that the essays do not engage more fully with recent
discussions of the issues raised by their material. Finally, language
barriers may very occasionally cause some confusion, an inevitable
casualty of international cooperation. Even the editors are not immune
to this problem, managing through a faulty idiom to state the opposite
of their intended meaning at several points in the introduction. Readers
should be willing to overlook their small frustrations, however, in view
of the fine scholarship and diverse nature of this collection. The
still-emerging field of early modern animal studies needs work like
this.
IAN MACINNES
Albion College