Margaret Taft. 2013. From Victim to Survivor: The Emergence and Development of the Holocaust Witness 1941-1949.
Jilovsky, Esther
Margaret Taft. 2013. From Victim to Survivor: The Emergence and
Development of the Holocaust Witness 1941-1949. London: Vallentine
Mitchell, Pp. 220. ISBN 9780853039761 (cloth)
As Konrad Kwiet observes in the Foreword to Margaret Taft's
newly published From Victim to Survivor: The Emergence and Development
of the Holocaust Witness 1941-1949, "soon there will be no further
living witnesses to testify to the horrors of the Holocaust (xii)."
Taft's book emerges as a corollary of this statement, although its
concern is not with the recent, wide-scale efforts to record these
witnesses' memories before it is too late, a project undertaken by
the USC Shoah Foundation and indeed, closer to home, the Jewish
Holocaust Centre in Melbourne. Instead, Taft takes us back to the 1940s,
to the time of the Holocaust and its immediate aftermath, and presents a
carefully documented and insightfully analysed account of bearing
witness from inside Nazi-occupied Europe.
In focusing on this time period of early, and even contemporaneous,
Holocaust testimony rather than the mass video recordings of the 1980s
and 1990s, her work builds on that of historians such as Laura Jockusch
(Collect and Record! Jewish Holocaust Documentation in Early Postwar
Europe (2012)) and Zoe Waxman (Writing the Holocaust: Identity,
Testimony, Representation (2006)), who have also analysed this early
Holocaust testimony.
From Victim to Survivor is chronologically divided into three
chapters which are not only delineated according to time periods, but
also to the types of sources available from the time in question. Hence,
the book chronicles the development of different forms of testimony
which emerged over the eight years in question.
Chapter 1, entitled "From Persecution to Annihilation: The
Struggle to Know and Understand, June 1941-January 1943," focuses
on bearing witness in the ghettoes, specifically those in Warsaw, Lodz,
Vilna and Kovno. Given the subject matter, Taft understandably uses the
Yiddish terms for the latter two, rather than the Lithuanian terms
Vilnius and Kaunas.
Chapter 2 "Confronting the Truth in a Period of Transition,
1944-1946" covers the somewhat initially disorientating time period
that encompasses 1945, without singling it out as the end of the war,
but the reasons for this become clear as the chapter progresses. The
chapter's analysis of survivor testimonies written towards the end
of the war and in the period of liberation--which of course varied
according to the circumstances in different parts of Europe--shows that
they were concerned with making sense of experience in a world which was
not particularly interested in Jewish suffering.
The immediate post-war period is discussed in Chapter 3, entitled
"From Private Victim to Public Survivor, 1947-1949," and this
chapter focuses on survivor memoirs written in this period. Taft argues
this select few nevertheless embody similar survival narratives that
correspond to that period of time.
Chapter 1 begins not with the Nazi invasion of Poland or the
beginning of World War II, but in 1941, because, as Taft explains,
"In the 18 month period from mid-1941 to the beginning of 1943, the
Jews in Eastern Europe were subjected to a systematic mass murder
campaign the nature and scale of which had never been experienced before
(15)." Anchoring her study with the conceptualisation and
implementation of the Final Solution, Taft allows the reader to be
immediately immersed in the perspectives of Jews experiencing this stage
of the Holocaust. While the chapter is based on fascinating documents
written at the time, it is a shame that Taft does not introduce the
individual texts at the beginning of the chapter but instead uses
phrasing such as "Ten diaries and chronicles that were written in
the ghettos of Warsaw, Lodz, Vilna and Kovno throughout this
eighteen-month period have been selected and analysed in order to
understand the different levels of awareness and the various ways in
which people in these communities came to understand what was happening
(17)." It would perhaps help to orient readers--not to mention
satisfy their curiosity--if the specific names of the diaries and other
sources were mentioned earlier.
Presenting the often heartbreaking accounts of Jews confined to
Nazi ghettos, Taft provides a deft analysis of what they knew about the
persecution of the Jews and the Final Solution at the time. For example,
Taft quotes Jozef Zelkowicz in the Lodz Ghetto, writing that "There
is one solitary thought about that: they are going to certain death. How
unbearable, how impossible to make peace with this thought (43)."
Taft thus shows how these captive Jews extrapolated from their own
experience and what they learnt about others in other places, in order
to illustrate the extent of knowledge these persecuted Jews did have of
their own and others' fates.
The chapter concludes that "Those with the capacity to see
beyond their own fate and that of their family, to what lay in store for
an entire people, were required to confront and address a new set of
circumstances. [...] In the context of the Final Solution, the
systematic and total extermination of an entire people was beyond human
experience and therefore beyond comprehension. There simply was no point
of reference (62)." Taft's sensitive and insightful analysis
does indeed show that this was the case according to extant testimonies
written in the ghettos of Warsaw, Lodz, Vilna and Kovno, and it makes
for very sobering reading indeed.
The scope of Chapter 2, which covers the period from 1944 until
1946, emphasises the continuity of Holocaust testimony, according to
Taft, over a time which saw huge changes: from war to peace, and from
persecution to freedom. Thus the focus moves from accounts written
during the Holocaust, to those written in the period of liberation, and
therefore with a very recent retrospective point of view on traumatic
events. It analyses several memoirs, but, as with Chapter 1, it would
have been helpful if the titles and authors of the memoirs were
mentioned earlier in the chapter, rather than introduced only in the
sections in which they are discussed.
It would also have been beneficial to address the gendered aspect
of testimony at some point. Taft does this in Chapter 3, albeit briefly,
as we shall discuss below. The "survivor works" discussed in
Chapter 2 are all written by men, among them Auschwitz escapees Rudolf
Vrba and Alfred Wetzler, Treblinka escapee Yankl Wiernik, Abraham
Sutzkever who escaped from the Vilna ghetto, and Marek Edelman, who
played a leading role in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. The analysis would
be enhanced by reflection on the aspects this focus on testimony by men
illuminates and those that it excludes.
Throughout Chapter 2, Taft emphasises what has been called the urge
to bear witness: "The number of memoirs that began to emerge from
1944 onwards, the different languages in which they were written and
their diverse publishing locations bear testament to the strong desire
felt by a significant number of survivors, no matter where they found
themselves following their liberation, to communicate their experiences
to others (75)." She classifies the types of responses into three
categories: messengers of the truth', recording their own
history' and heroic resistance: a paradigm for survival"'
(77), thus encapsulating the widely ranging goals that these witnesses
had, which went beyond just chronicling their own experiences of
survival, to seeking communication of these experiences to a wide
audience. Taft argues that "Survivors felt compelled to communicate
their experiences to the outside world, a world that they perceived as
remaining indifferent to their plight" (112). Thus, Taft explains
the myth of immediate post-war silence in terms of a world that did not
want to know about the fate of the Jews, rather than the commonly held
view that the traumatised survivors did not want to tell of their
experiences.
Chapter 3 takes up this angle by analysing six memoirs which were
written between 1947 and 1949, this time including two by women, Olga
Lengyel and Gisella Perl, as well as accounts by Primo Levi, Albert
Menasche, Vladka Meed and Tuvia Borzykowski. Taft notes that "The
establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 gave many survivors hope
for regeneration and reconstruction. It also gave survivors a sense of
empowerment, self-determination and security; a sense that they could
once more assume responsibility for their lives and their future"
(126), thus alluding to a Zionist context that is not necessarily
evident from the texts she analyses.
Furthermore, Taft links the diverse memoirs analysed in this
chapter according to the moral authority of the author, asserting that
"those who wrote memoirs at this time came from a select group that
was recognized as having a particular moral authority which entitled
them to speak when many could not. [...] They influenced the way in
which Jewish survivor communities of this early post-war period
understood the Holocaust and what it meant to be a survivor'"
(125). It is worth considering whether this claim, convincingly
substantiated in Taft's analysis, applies in a wider context.
In Chapter 3, Taft does broach the gendered aspect of testimony.
She quotes Myrna Goldenberg on "the social bonding that occurred
between women in the concentration camps" (146). It is a shame
however that Taft does not investigate this problematic claim any
further, and this example illustrates how, in certain places, the
manuscript would benefit from a more critical approach to terms and
assumptions, for instance challenging the notion that women were better
caregivers rather than accepting it at face value. There are also some
minor but unfortunate typos such as "Vina" instead of
"Vilna" (70), an incorrect chapter heading on page 133, and
"David Baile" instead of "David Biale" (162).
Despite these minor shortcomings, From Victim to Survivor is
recommended reading for anyone interested in the history of the
Holocaust witness, or indeed in the development of the Holocaust as it
unfolded, from the victims' perspective. Undergraduate and
postgraduate students as well as academics will find this book a very
useful and informative companion to the study of eyewitness accounts of
the Holocaust.