Effect of basalt addition on tribological performance of FeCrSiB HVOF coatings/Basaldi lisandi moju kiirleekpihustusmeetodiga saadud FeCrSiB-pinde tribokarakteristikule.

Antonov, Maksim ; Surzenkov, Andrei ; Hussainova, Irina 等

1. INTRODUCTION

Products made of basalt (mineral) are recently gaining sufficient attention due to the depletion of raw materials for production of reinforcement for constructional and wear resistant materials (tungsten carbide for cermets, steels for metalpolymer composites and reinforced concrete, etc) [1-5]. Basalt has sufficient strength, high hardness, low density and superior corrosion resistance. It has sufficiently lower price level comparing to tungsten carbide and lower than that of alloys. Basalt and other mineral additions are also used in thick metal coatings to adjust their thermal expansion to that of the steel substrate [6,7]. High velocity oxygen fuel coating method is one of the methods allowing to prepare solid basalt-steel composite materials since the melting temperature of basalt and steels are very close and materials obtained by casting or sintering will have low mechanical properties. HVOF spraying allows to minimize solubility between phases while providing coatings with low porosity suitable for elevated temperatures that are required for high efficiency of thermal processes in energy applications.

Favourable effect of the basalt addition on the wear resistance has been documented mostly for composites when basalt was harder than the binder material (aluminium, plastics, etc) and basalt addition gave rise to the total hardness [1-5]. The aim of the current work is to study the change in tribological response under erosive, abrasive, reciprocal and continuous sliding conditions when basalt is added to the harder matrix. Minerals exhibit brittle behaviour under shock loading conditions. Testing in a wide range of conditions was required to provide information for future research, directed to make materials where mineral additions are favourable for improving the thermal expansion coefficient, corrosion resistance and also the resistance to wear.

2. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

2.1. Materials

Coatings were applied by the HVOF spray method onto flat C45 (EN 10083, SAE1045) unalloyed carbon steel (0.45 C, 0.60 Mn, 0.30 Si, balance Fe; wt %) substrate of the size 25 * 50 mm. Thickness of the substrate was 10 mm. JP-5000 HVOF TAFA system with the 5220 spray gun were used for deposition of coatings. Main parameters of the HVOF spray process are given in Table 1. Mean thickness of the coating was 300-400 [micro]m. FeCrSiB and FeCrSiB-12 vol % basalt coatings were prepared. FeCrSiB self-fluxing alloy powder (13.7 Cr, 2.7 Si, 3.4 B, 2.1 C, 6 Ni, balance Fe; wt %) with particles of spherical shape and size of 10-45 um was supplied by Hoganas AB. Basalt powder of 25-45 um size was produced in the Laboratory of Disintegrator Technology of Tallinn University of Technology by disintegrator milling from wastes of different dimensions and shapes, remaining from basalt production routine (Fig. 1). It was found that basalt was melted during thermal spraying and is well incorporated into the steel matrix (Fig. 2). Initial content of basal in the powder mixture was 25 vol %. Actual content of basalt (12 vol %) was verified using SEM image according to ASTM E112-10. Steel droplets are able to remove some of the basalt from the surface during deposition due to their high kinetic energy (steel has density about 3 times higher than basalt) that results in reduced basalt concentration in final coating comparing to initial powder. Composition of basalt (wt %) determined by EDS was found to be as follows: 51.8 02, 1.7 Na, 2.2 Mg, 8.2 Al, 24.1 Si, 1.1 K, 4.8 Ca, 0.6 Ti, 0.1 Mn, 5.5 Fe. Hardness of coatings, phases and substrate are shown in Fig. 3 (measured by Buehler Micromet 2001 microhardness tester (HV0.05) and Indentec 5030 SKV Vickers hardness testing machine (HV1, HV10 and HV50)). Images were obtained by Zeiss EVO MA15 scanning electron microscope equipped with Oxford Instruments INCA Energy System EDS.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

2.2. Reciprocating sliding test conditions

Universal Micro Materials Tester (UMT-2) from CETR (Bruker) was applied for reciprocating sliding testing of coatings. Test conditions are shown in Table 2. The surface of the test sample is placed horizontally and the wear debris generated stay inside the wear track or are located around it.

Wear track profile was measured in the middle of its length by Mahr perthometer, PGK 120, in contact mode. Obtained area lost was multiplied by amplitude to get the volume of material lost.

2.3. Continuous sliding and three-body abrasion conditions

Continuous sliding with and without the abrasive was performed on Multifunctional Modular Tribosystem (MMTS) specially designed at TUT [8] (Table 3). This device enables one to measure the coefficient of friction (COF) of the ring-abrasive-block tribosystem. The ring is driven and the surface of the block undergoing wear is placed vertically that allows the wear debris to fall down once they are generated. During tests at elevated temperatures the sample (block) was heated. The temperature of the test surface before the test is controlled by an external contact thermocouple. After the beginning of the tests, the internal thermocouple is used for holding of the test temperature, taking into account the temperature drop. Load of 49N is sufficient to cause partial crushing of the abrasive [8]. Surface of the ring was cleaned by abrasive paper (silicon carbide, ISO/FEPA Grit P400) between tests.

2.4. Erosion testing conditions

Erosion tests were carried out using centrifugal accelerator CAK-5. Test conditions are summarized in Table 4. The device allows testing of 15 samples simultaneously in equal conditions [9].

3. RESULTS

Results of the wear testing and SEM images of plain FeCrSiB coatings and of those with the addition of basalt are given in Figs 4 and 5. The wear rate in reciprocating and continuous sliding condition is of the same level. Higher hardness of alumina results in higher wear rates comparing to those obtained with the chrome steel ball. During reciprocating sliding, the surface of the coatings is placed horizontally thus reducing the ability of wear debris to escape from wear track that reduce the wear rate for the tests with steel ball in contact. The highest wear in case of reciprocal wear was observed for short tests, carried out with high frequency of movements by hard aluminium balls. Basalt has the tendency to fall out at these frequencies (Fig. 5). High wear rate in the beginning is typical for non-conformal tests when the wear rate later decreases due to the reduction of the contact pressure, caused by the wear of one or both of the bodies in contact. Reciprocal tests result in the highest wear rate differentiation between coatings. The most negative effect of basalt on the wear resistance of coatings takes place under the lowest load using alumina balls. Soft steel balls were not able to cause significant wear and even some transfer of steel to the coatings and its intensive oxidation was found (Fig. 5).

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Only in continuous sliding mode the FeCrSiB coating with basalt was showing slightly better wear resistance than the plain one (Figs 4 and 5). Increased wear rates of both coatings were observed at higher temperatures that is explained by their softening.

Basalt addition has no measurable effect on COF of coatings. COF of both coatings was in the range of 0.50-1.10 and 0.50-0.75 for reciprocating and continuous sliding regimes, respectively. In three-body abrasive conditions the COF of the ring-abrasive-block tribosystems was in the range of 0.20-0.25 that is showing that the rolling of abrasive rather than ploughing and crushing takes place [8]. Rolling results in multiple impacting of the coatings surface, however, some sliding and ploughing also takes place (Fig. 5). The wear rates are much higher than in reciprocal and continuous sliding.

Wear rate of the basalt containing coating under erosive conditions is higher than that of plain coatings (Fig. 4). The difference in wear rates is reduced when coatings are tested at high velocity.

4. DISCUSSION

Basalt has lower hardness than the FeCrSiB coating (Fig. 3). Addition of basalt leads to the decrease in hardness of the composite coating that usually means a reduction in wear resistance as well. Adhesion between phases in a composite material is of paramount importance. Melting and high velocity of impact of basalt and FeCrSiB matrix powder during HVOF coating procedure enables to achieve a certain level of adhesion. However, basalt inclusions in the present composite are flake shaped and are easily broken during mechanical loading. That is why addition of basalt was favourable only in continuous sliding conditions with low velocity and low force (Figs 4 and 5). Wear process at low velocity generates less vibration. Almost no basalt is remaining during reciprocating sliding at a frequency of 10 Hz, while sliding at 1 Hz is milder (Fig. 5). It is also possible that basalt may act as a solid lubricant, thus reducing the adhesion between bodies in contact. Soft steel ring is favourable since it can embody some of the basalt rather than to generate extreme stresses that take place when wear particles get stuck between the alumina ball and coating. The concentration of basalt may be insufficient or it is required to coat the ring instead of the block. It was suggested in [10,11] to coat the body with largest area of surface in contact. Supply of solid lubricant is then sufficient to provide adequate lubrication. This is supported by the fact that if the continuous sliding test of FeCrSiB-basalt coating was repeated without cleaning the ring by abrasive paper then the wear rate of the coating was decreased.

It is required to make the shape of the basalt inclusions rather spherical than of flake shape by reducing the heat input during HVOF spray deposition and avoiding full melting. Also it is favourable to reduce the size of the basalt inclusions that facilitate the formation of mechanically mixed layer (MML) that is favourable in many cases [9,12]. This is supported by the fact that FeCrSiB-basalt coatings exhibited comparably good wear rates in erosive conditions under high velocity (Fig. 4) when formation of MML typically takes place in case of metal containing material. However, some precautions should be made to avoid burning of the fine basalt particles that is possible during the HVOF coating procedure. It should also be decided how to reduce the basalt losses during spraying due to the significant difference in the density of the powders.

5. CONCLUSIONS

1. Addition of macroparticles of basalt into FeCrSiB-alloy based HVOF sprayed coating has resulted in the reduction of wear resistance under most of the conditions where dynamic loading takes place.

2. Addition of basalt is favourable in continuous sliding conditions with low velocity, low force and with steel counterbody that may form surface layer enriched by basalt inclusions.

3. Shape and size of the basalt inclusions should be optimized to provide better resistance of FeCrSiB-basalt HVOF sprayed coatings against wear.

doi: 10.3176/eng.2012.3.06

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Estonian Science Foundation (grant No. 8850) and Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (grant SF0140062s08) are acknowledged for supporting this research.

REFERENCES

[1.] Singh, M., Modi, O.P., Dasgupta, R. and Jha A. K. High stress abrasive wear behaviour of aluminium alloy-granite particle composite. Wear, 1999, 233-235, 455-161.

[2.] Czigany, T. Basalt fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2005, 473-474, 59-66.

[3.] Cao, S., Liu, H., Ge, S. and Wu, G. Mechanical and tribological behaviors of UHMWPE com posites filled with basalt fibers. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2011, 30, 1-9.

[4.] Todic, A., Nedeljkovic, B., Cikara, D. and Ristovic, I. Particulate basalt-polymer composites characteristics investigation. Mater. Des., 2011, 32, 1677-1683.

[5.] Akinci, A., Ercenk, E., Yilmaz, S. and Sen, U. Slurry erosion behaviors of basalt filled low density polyethylene composites. Mater. Des., 2011, 32, 3106-3111.

[6.] Markisches Werk, Crystal coat-an impermeable mineral-metal multiphase coating. http://www.mwh.de/Innovation/Innovations/MWH_CrystalCoat_CC_200.aspx (accessed online 05/05/2012).

[7.] Dietrich, M., Verlotski, V., VaBen, R. and Stover, D. Metal-glass based composites for novel TBC-systems. Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech., 2001, 32, 669-672.

[8.] Antonov, M., Hussainova, I., Veinthal, R. and Pirso, J. Effect of temperature and load on three body abrasion of cermets and steel. Tribol. Int., 2012, 46, 261-268.

[9.] Antonov, M., Hussainova, I., Pirso, J. and Volobujeva, O. Assessment of mechanically mixed layer developing during high temperature erosion of cermets. Wear, 2007, 263 (7-12), 878-886.

[10.] Michalczewski, R., Antonov, M., Vlad, M., Szczerek, M. and Hussainova, I. The assessment of the coated elements behaviour before and after scuffing under four-ball lubricated testing conditions. In Proc. 2nd European Conference on Tribology ECOTRIB. Pisa, Italy, 2009, 107-112.

[11.] Szczerek, M., Michalczewski, R. and Piekoszewski, W. The problems of application of PVD/CVD thin hard coatings for heavy-loaded machine components. In Proc. ASME/STLE International Joint Tribology Conference. Miami, Fl, 2008, 35-37.

[12.] Antonov, M. and Hussainova, I. Cermets surface transformation under erosive and abrasive wear. Tribol. Int., 2010, 43, 1566-1575.

Maksim Antonov (a), Andrei Surzenkov (a), Irina Hussainova (a), Dmitri Goljandin (a) and Valdek Mikli (b)

(a) Department of Materials Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology; Maksim.Antonov@ttu.ee

(b) Centre for Materials Research, Tallinn University of Technology

(a,b) Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia

Received 15 June 2012, in revised form 1 August 2012

Table 1. Parameters of the HVOF spraying
process

Parameter                      Value

Oxygen flow, l/min             920
Fuel flow (kerosene), l/min    0.36
Nitrogen flow, l/min           6.5
Combustion pressure, bar       7.1
Barrel length, inch            4
Spray distance, mm             380
Powder feed rate, g/min        152

Table 2. Reciprocal test conditions performed using UMT-2

Parameter         Description

Scheme            Ball-on-plate, plate is moving
Ball              [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3], HV1 = 1700, 3 mm in diameter
                  Chrome steel EN 100Cr6 (AISI 52100), HV1 = 800, 3
                    and 10 mm in diameter
Plate             10 x 25 x 50 mm with HVOF sprayed coating applied
Amplitude         2 mm
Frequency (mean   1, 5, 10, 20 Hz (0.004, 0.020, 0.040, 0.080 m
  velocity)         [s.sup.-1])
Force against     2.0, 4.9, 9.8, 78.4 N (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 8.0 kg)
  specimen
Atmosphere        Air, relative humidity 45 [+ or -] 10%.
                    Temperature 25 [degrees]C

Table 3. Sliding and 3-body abrasion test conditions performed using
MMTS

Specification                         Description

                      Continuous sliding        Three-body abrasion

Scheme                  Block-on-Ring

Ring                  [empty set] 85 mm, breadth-10 mm, steel EN 10025
                                    S355, HV10 = 230

Block                 10 x 25 x 50 mm with HVOF sprayed coating
                                        applied

Circumferential     0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00       1.00 m [s.sup.-1]
  velocity               m [s.sup.-1]

Linear abrasion     2670 m (10 000 rounds)       27 m (100 rounds)

Abrasive                                       Si[O.sub.2] with size
                                                  of 0.2-0.3 mm,
                                                [HV.sub.1] = 1100,
                                                  feed rate 300 g
                                                   [min.sup.-1]

Force against       24.5 N (2.5 kg), 49 N           49 N (5 kg)
  specimen           (5 kg), 98 N (10 kg)

Atmosphere              Air, relative humidity 45 [+ or -] 10%

Temperature of        25 [+ or -] 5, 300         25 [+ or -] 5, 500
  test surface     [+ or -] 10, 500 [+ or -]   [+ or -] 15 [degrees]C
                        15 [degrees]C

Heating and             Heating rate 15 [degrees]C [min.sup.-1],
  cooling rates,       holding before test 20 min, cooling rate 25
  holding time                  [degrees]C [min.sup.-1]

Table 4. Erosion test conditions

Parameter                             Description

Abrasive           Si[O.sub.2] with size of 0.2-0.3 mm, HV1 = 1100,
                     6 kg for one test
Impact velocity    25 and 50 m [s.sup.-1]
Impact angle       30[degrees]
Atmosphere         Air, relative humidity 45 [+ or -] 10%,
                     temperature 25 [degrees]C