Crest-trough asymmetry of waves generated by high-speed ferries/Kiirlaevalainete asummeetriast.
Kurennoy, Dmitry ; Didenkulova, Ira ; Soomere, Tarmo 等
1. INTRODUCTION
Long waves in shallow water frequently exhibit non-linear
characteristics. One of the simplest means for adequate description of
such waves is the framework of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation,
which has a rigorous periodic solution in the form of a cnoidal wave
[1]. A sketch of the cnoidal wave is presented in Fig. 1. Cnoidal waves
have relatively high and narrow crests and wide troughs, with the
deviation from still water level at the trough being less than the
elevation at the crest. Equivalently, the wave-induced water surface
depression at the trough has a longer duration than the elevation at the
crest. When the wave period tends to infinity, a cnoidal wave will
evolve into a solitary wave--a KdV soliton.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Waves of this type can be induced by ships. In 1844, John Scott
Russell observed an 'exotic water dome' preceding a vessel
that had suddenly stopped, but had been previously moving at a small
rate of acceleration in a canal of uniform depth. This phenomenon became
known as Russell's wave or Russell's soliton [2], eventually
leading to many studies around the world aimed at understanding and
describing similar phenomena.
Solitons and other strongly non-linear disturbances of the water
surface are excited relatively infrequently by ships. Typically, a
moving ship generates a sequence of almost linear surface gravity waves
[3]. However, in special cases, a single water elevation with a stable
profile or highly non-linear wave groups mimicking solitons of different
kinds can be produced [4]. Such soliton-like features were observed, for
example, in [5]. In this study, wave-staff measurements of the Kelvin
wake of the Coast Guard cutter Point Brower, showed a solitary feature,
resembling the so-called envelope solitons occurring 1-4 km behind the
vessel.
Specific types of ship disturbances, such as high leading waves,
monochromatic packets of relatively short waves [5], solitary and
cnoidal wave trains preceding a ship [6] and their associated depression
areas [7], all qualitatively differ from typically occurring wind waves
and from constituents of linear Kelvin wakes, and have been studied
extensively during the last few decades [4]. However, very little is
known about how frequently ship wakes exhibit strongly non-linear
features.
Usually, non-linear effects become evident when large ships sail at
relatively high speeds in shallow areas or narrow channels. Non-linear
components are frequently observed in wakes of so-called fast ferries
[4]. For example, the majority of waves with the longest wavelength and
the largest amplitudes generated by the high-speed ferries on the
Tallinn-Helsinki route in Tallinn Bay regularly show non-linear features
and resemble cnoidal waves in the coastal area [8]. Another
well-documented phenomenon is the extensive drawdown of the water level
when a large ship sails in a narrow channel. There are many such
observations from Sweden where ships frequently enter into narrow
straits [9] and from Germany, where properties of waves, generated by
high tonnage container merchant ships longer than 300 m have been
studied [10]. Similar studies have also been done in New Zealand, where
the sudden introduction of fast ferries to a coastal area caused rapid
and significant changes to beaches [11,12]. High, nonlinear vessel wakes
are considered to be able to seriously damage the coastal environment
[4,11,13].
One of the primary features of the appearance of non-linearity in
the generation and propagation of surface waves is the potential
deviation of the wave shape from the sinusoidal form. The shape of the
waves is extremely important, because many properties of water particles
in long linear and weakly non-linear waves (in particular, the velocity
components) linearly depend on the surface displacement[1]. It has been
recently demonstrated that the difference between the steepness of the
wave front and its back (so-called back-front asymmetry) has substantial
effect on the wave runup properties [14]. An equally important measure
of the wave asymmetry is the ratio of the crest height over the trough
depth (in the following called crest-trough asymmetry). This measure to
some extent characterizes the excess velocities in non-linear waves
compared to linear waves with the same length and height. In this study
we focus on the crest-trough asymmetry only. Note that these definitions
of asymmetry are not necessarily related to each other. For example,
cnoidal waves are a classical example of waves with extensive
crest-trough asymmetry but with no front-back asymmetry.
Although the presence of cnoidal waves in Tallinn Bay, resulting
from fast ferries wakes, is well known [8], there is little research
into their properties in the deeper parts of the nearshore. Their
presence, through creation of unexpectedly large near-bottom velocities
[8] or large impulse loads [15], may cause dangerous and environmentally
damaging conditions in coastal areas not normally endangered by commonly
occurring shorter, albeit higher, wind waves. Theoretically, the shape
and properties of long ship waves, propagating in a shallow region with
an ideal flat bottom, should match those of the corresponding solution
of the KdV equation. In realistic conditions, however, the sea bottom is
never perfect and precise prediction of the dynamics of waves
approaching the shoreline is not possible. The aim of this study is to
examine the shape of long ship waves, produced by high-speed ferries in
Tallinn Bay. The research is focused on determining the asymmetry
coefficients of these waves (the ratio of the crest height over the
trough depth with respect to the still water surface) directly from the
water surface time series in an intermediate region of the nearshore
where non-linear effects become substantial but the wave profile remains
smooth. The goal is to determine if possible adverse effects of long
ship-generated waves can be quantified in terms of the cnoidal wave
theory.
2. MEASUREMENTS AND DATA PROCESSING
The properties of ship waves in the nearshore were obtained during
a field experiment during the summer of 2008 [13]. An ultrasonic
echosounder (LOG aLevel[R] from General Acoustics) was used for
continuous water surface elevation recording at 5 Hz. The device was
mounted on a heavy and stable tripod at a water depth of approximately
2.7 m, 100 m from the shore (Fig. 2). The orientation of isobaths in
this area was virtually perpendicular to the crests of the largest
vessel waves, which allowed for good wave transmission and minimum
refraction-diffraction effects.
Most of the nearshore between the tripod and the section of the
coastline between a jetty and cape Talneem in Fig. 2 contains numerous
boulders and is almost non-reflective. The largest ship waves, after
passing the tripod, usually propagated towards a small beach adjacent to
the jetty (marked as Study Site in Fig. 2). The nearshore sediments
along the line of propagation consisted of small boulders interspersed
with some coarse sand, gravel, and cobbles. The beach was almost
non-reflective [13]. The jetty was protected by wave-absorbing
tetrapods, reducing wave reflection back towards the measurement site.
The described features allowed for a relatively clean record of incoming
waves. This area of the coast, which has also been the subject of
several previous studies [13,16-20], was, therefore, a suitable place
for measurements of vessel wave parameters.
During the entire experiment, 650 wakes from different vessels were
recorded. The most interesting were waves from the classical high-speed
ferries SuperSeaCat, Nordic Jet, and Baltic Jet, and from highly powered
but otherwise conventional ferries Talliuk Star, Superstar and
SuperFast, and Viking XPRS (Table 1).
An initial data evaluation was performed to identify and remove
unreliable readings [13,19]. As the complete record included both wind
and vessel wakes, an attempt was made to separate ship wakes from the
complex signal with the use of low-pass filters. The wake records were
identified for particular ships, visually and using scheduled departure
times from Tallinn. Wakes from ships sailing to Tallinn and combined
wakes [13,18], in which signals from two ships were superimposed, were
eliminated from the analysis. Thus, the waves considered for further
analysis were excited by single vessels sailing from Tallinn.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
A typical wave record (Fig. 3) shows a group structure and usually
consists of at least three wave groups with varying wave parameters
(amplitude, period, and symmetry properties). The amplitudes of
so-called precursor solitons that arrive before the highest waves are
usually negligible in open sea conditions [4]. The highest waves at
distances of a few kilometers from the ship lane are usually the longest
waves concentrated in the first group of the wakes [16]. Their
parameters can be reproduced numerically with an acceptable accuracy,
and they usually cause the largest impact on the beach in terms of the
wave runup [20]. They are also asymmetric with a clear prevalence of the
crest height over the trough depth (Fig. 3). Waves belonging to all
other groups are mostly symmetric. Waves from the first group are able
to carry additional water mass to the shore [20] and therefore can have
significant impact on nearshore processes.
In cases with low wind wave background, the identification of ship
waves was straightforward. An elliptical low-pass filter was used to
separate relatively long ship waves from wind waves on more windy days.
A comparison of filtered and original data allowed for a more accurate
definition of the duration of the wake and its first group (Fig. 3). On
several days, however, the wave background was so strong that it was
virtually impossible to filter out the wind waves. A detailed overview
of the procedure is given in [13,19]. As a result, 163 wake records,
collected on 15 days, were selected for the final analysis.
In contrast to the analysis of maximum and integral characteristics
of the wakes in [13,19], the analysis of the wave asymmetry in terms of
the ratio of the crest height over the trough depth was performed
separately for each wave of the first group in each wake. An intrinsic
problem with the wave data, recorded in field conditions, is that both
wind and ship waves occur in the recording. Generally, wind waves cannot
be removed by the standard filtering procedures because they normally
suppress higher harmonics of the ship waves as well and thus distort
their profiles and asymmetry properties. Therefore it is more consistent
to use the non-filtered record for calculation of asymmetry properties.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Doing so leads to fairly limited changes of the resulting asymmetry
coefficient when wind waves are much shorter and smaller than long ship
waves. In most of the records, the typical height of wind waves was
about 10%-25% from that of ship waves in question whereas the typical
periods of wind and ship waves were 1-2 s and 7-15 s, respectively. It
is straightforward to establish that an analysis of crest heights and
trough depths of a combined field of long, relatively high waves and
much shorter and lower waves would result in almost equivalent
overestimation of both measures by about a half of the shorter wave
height, compared to the analysis of the ideal long-wave signal.
Consequently, the potential asymmetry would be certainly detected
whereas the exact values of the asymmetry coefficient would be slightly
underestimated. Much larger errors in establishing the length (or
period) of long waves may, however, occur in the analysis of a combined
wave field. Therefore it is reasonable to determine the wave amplitudes
from the original (combined) record, but to find the wave periods from a
filtered record.
For the listed reasons we have applied a multistep algorithm for
defining the asymmetry coefficient. Initially, a low-pass elliptical
filter with a relatively low cut-off frequency was used to separate
single long waves from the raw data. The filtering procedure resulted,
as expected, in a time shift of the filtered signal compared to the
original record. The magnitude of this shift is defined by the
parameters of the filter and was removed from the filtered data. The
zero-crossing time instants were detected from the resulting time
series. Single waves were then separated by applying both the
zero-upcrossing and zero-down-crossing methods [21] to the filtered
record. Finally, the crest heights, trough depths and the corresponding
asymmetry coefficients for each full wave were calculated from the
original, unfiltered record. As a result, 1346 waves from the first
group of the selected 163 wakes, each representing a single ship, were
included in the analysis.
Another non-trivial aspect in the described process is how to
determine the reference water level. In order to avoid distortions of
the calculated asymmetry coefficients, the mean sea level for each wake
under consideration was established using a 20-min long section of wind
wave recording immediately before or after the wake [13].
3. RESULTS
Comparison of the average value and standard deviation of the
asymmetry coefficient, calculated through the application of
zero-upcrossing and zero-downcrossing methods (Fig. 4), shows that both
methods give very similar results for these parameters. This is not
unexpected and shows that the highest crests and deepest troughs usually
occur in sequence. This feature also indicates that the vessel waves, by
nature, are more akin to regular oscillations than to freak waves (which
frequently are characterized as specific sequences in which a deep
trough is followed by a high, steep crest [22]).
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
The empirical distributions of asymmetry coefficients for different
vessels (Fig. 5) show that the most frequent values for the ratio of the
crest height over the trough depth lie between 1 and 1.6. The crest
height, on average, exceeds the trough depth by approximately 30%-40%.
A joint distribution of the probability of occurrence of the wave
asymmetry for waves with different heights and periods for the entire
set of waves (Fig. 6) confirms that the most frequent value of the
coefficient of asymmetry is about 1.4. As expected, waves with higher
amplitudes generally have larger asymmetry coefficient values.
Interestingly, there is no evident correlation of the wave
asymmetry with the wave period (Fig. 7). The entire set of waves in
question contains two major groups of long waves with periods about 8
and 13 s, respectively. Within these groups, the wave asymmetry changes
significantly from 1 to 2.5, but there is no clear difference in
asymmetry for these groups. This feature is somewhat unexpected, because
an increase of the length of an ideal cnoidal wave in water of constant
depth is accompanied by an increase of the crest height and a decrease
of the trough depth. A possible explanation of this non-alignment is
that the approaching waves are being shaped by a longer section of the
coastal slope and that the "effective" depth, defining the
wave asymmetry, is larger for longer waves. This argument is discussed
in more detail below.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
The analysis confirms that all the vessels generate asymmetric
waves (Fig. 5). The relevant distributions have somewhat different
shapes. The distributions for Star, Superstar, SuperSeaCat and Nordic
Jet and Baltic Jet are unimodal and have a bell-like, mostly symmetric
shape resembling the normal distribution. The distribution for SuperFast
has a bimodal shape; however, this feature may also reflect a wide
distribution and an insufficient number of analysed wakes. The
distribution for Viking XPRS is asymmetric. Both are also relatively
wide. While almost all the waves excited by Star, Superstar, SuperSeaCat
and Nordic Jet and Baltic Jet have the asymmetry coefficient well below
2, SuperFast and Viking XPRS frequently cause waves with this
coefficient close to or exceeding 2. This feature is somewhat
unexpected, because the distributions of the typical maximum height in
wakes from these ships differ considerably [19] whereas the periods of
their largest waves almost coincide. Nordic Jet and Baltic Jet
demonstrate the least asymmetry. This feature may be related to the fact
that these vessels are catamarans, whereas all the other vessels are
monohulls.
It has been demonstrated in [19] that the distributions of the
basic properties of the vessel wakes, such as the maximum wave height,
total wake energy and energy flux are very similar and that the maximum
wave height of the wake is an appropriate parameter to characterize the
ship wakes and their variability. The above analysis, however, suggests
that the asymmetry coefficient of the largest ship waves may serve as an
additional useful indicator of the properties of ship wakes.
Finally, we attempt to represent the above properties of vessel
waves in terms of cnoidal wave theory. The analysis below is an
extension of similar research performed for a small set of ship waves
near Aegna jetty in [8]. Linear wave theory, which has been widely used
for the description of surface waves and their interactions, is only
applicable provided the wave height is small compared to the wave length
and water depth. The basic requirement [kappa]H/2 << 1, where
[kappa] = 2[pi]/L << 1 is the wave number, L is the wave length
and H is the wave height [1]), is frequently violated for ship waves in
the nearshore. The length of a typical wave from a fast ferry with a
period of about 10 s [13,16] is L [greater than or equal to]30N[square
root of h] m and therefore water with depth h [less than or equal to] 10
m can be already considered as shallow. An appropriate parameter in
shallow areas is the Ursell number U = H[L.sup.2][h.sup.-3] [1]. When U
[congruent to] 1, linear theory is useful, even when the condition
[kappa]H/2 <<1 is violated. For moderate Ursell numbers (up to U
[congruent to] 75) and L/h < 8 -10, various modifications of Stokes
wave theory can be used [1]. The Ursell number for such a wave in the
coastal area (h [congruent to] 3 m) is U [congruent to] 100H where ship
waves of moderate height (H [congruent to] 0.5 m) correspond to U
[congruent to] 50. For even longer or higher waves (that frequently
occur in the study area [13,16]), or for lesser depths, Stokes wave
theory is generally not applicable [1] and cnoidal wave theory is
preferable.
The ratio of the crest height [A.sub.+] = H - h (Fig. 1) and the
trough depth [A.sub.-] = h - [h.sub.t] for an ideal cnoidal wave,
propagating over an area of constant depth, can be calculated from the
following equation [1]:
[[A.sub.+]/[A.sub.-] = [m/m+E/K-1] - 1. (1)
Here K and E are complete elliptic integrals of the first and
second kind:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)
and values of the parameter m = [square root of k] (elliptic
modulus) can be found for different values of the wave height H and
period T from the following relationship:
H/h [[gT.sup.2]/h] = 16/3 m[K.sup.2](m) (3)
for the given water depth h.
When a cnoidal wave propagates over a sea area of variable depth,
its parameters obviously change with changes in the water depth. The
measurement site of the water surface elevation is located in a 2.7 m
deep area along a coastal slope, whereas the actual water depth may vary
over the typical length (~80 m) of a ship wave with a period of 10 s
from about 5 to 2 m. For that reason, the water depth, estimated from
Eqs. (1)-(3), systematically exceeds the actual water depth at the
measurement site. The reason is that the properties of waves propagating
along a coastal slope express the variations of the depth over a longer
section of the slope.
However, Eqs. (1)-(3) make it possible to calculate the
"effective" depth for the ship waves, the parameters of which
(period, height and asymmetry coefficient) are determined at the
measurement site. Figure 8 demonstrates that this "effective"
depth for most of the waves in question is between 2.7 and 5 m. In this
figure, the dashed lines correspond to the asymmetry coefficient of
cnoidal waves with maximum and minimum periods of waves analysed for the
particular ship at a water depth of 2.7 m (maximum period, the lower
line) and 5 m (minimum period, the almost vertical line). As data
points, representing the properties of most of the analysed waves, fit
into the sector defined by these lines, it is concluded that cnoidal
wave theory is a suitable framework for their description.
While data points, reflecting asymmetry of most of the ship waves,
fit into the sector defined by these lines, a substantial number of
waves generated by Nordic Jet and Baltic Jet do not. Moreover, waves
from these sister ships frequently have the asymmetry coefficient below
1, that is, the wave troughs are systematically deeper than the crest
heights. This peculiarity confirms that wave asymmetry is an important
characteristic of wakes from different ships that does not necessarily
correlate with the maximum wave height of the wakes. As Nordic Jet and
Baltic Jet are the only catamarans among the fleet, it may be assumed
that the frequent occurrence of deep troughs in the wakes is caused by
the interference of wave systems, created by the two hulls.
All the waves analysed above are relatively long (Fig. 7) and thus
expected to be, at least, slightly cnoidal at the location of the wave
recorder. Therefore, one would expect almost all waves to show clearly
expressed asymmetry with the relevant coefficient > 1. There is,
however, also a number of waves for monohulls with the asymmetry
coefficient <1 (Figs. 5-8). While a few "anomalous" waves
with an asymmetry well below 1 could be attached to the natural
variability of the parameters of complex, realistic wave fields, a
relatively large number of such waves is an interesting feature that
deserves further consideration.
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSIONS
Statistical analysis of the appearance of the first group of the
longest and highest waves in wakes from fast ferries shows that the
asymmetry of the waves in terms of the ratio of the crest height over
the trough is an important parameter of the wakes. Its value does not
necessarily correlate with the maximum wave height in the wakes, a
quantity that otherwise characterizes well the basic properties of the
wakes [19]. In particular, the distribution of the asymmetry may serve
as a key for deciding, from the wake structure, whether the ship was a
catamaran or a monohull. Although this feature has been observed only in
Tallinn Bay, the Baltic Sea, it is likely to apply to other fast ferry
traffic in different locations.
The presented results confirm that cnoidal wave theory is useful
for the analysis and forecast of the properties and impact of waves from
fast ferries in locations with an inhomogeneous bottom, as concluded in
[8], based on observations of the shape of a very limited set of ship
waves.
The average asymmetry coefficient for the ship waves studied is
approximately 1.4. The wave crests are, therefore, about 40% higher than
the water surface dropdown at the wave troughs. This value indicates a
high level of non-linearity of the otherwise perfectly smooth waves in
the nearshore at a depth of about 2.5-3 m and confirms the necessity of
using appropriate non-linear methods to adequately describe the impact
of such waves. Last but not least, the similarity of results obtained
using the zero-upcrossing and zero-downcrossing methods suggests that
ship waves are more similar to regular wave trains or groups than to
freak waves.
doi: 10.3176/eng.2009.3.03
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by the Estonian Science Foundation
(grant No. 7413), Estonian block grant SF0140077s08, Marie Curie scheme
(TK project LENS-CMA, MC-TK-013909, and RTN project SEAMOCS,
MRTN-CT-2005-019374), EEA grant EMP41 and RFBR grants (08-02-00039,
08-05-00069, 0805-91850). The authors would like to thank Bryna Flaim
(University of Waikato, New Zealand) for her help in preparing the paper
and Kevin Parnell (James Cook University, Australia) for his
contribution into the experiment and for extensive help in polishing the
final version of the paper.
Received 31 March 2009, in revised form 18 June 2009
REFERENCES
[1.] Massel, S. R. Hydrodynamics of Coastal Zones. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1989.
[2.] Russell, J. S. Report on waves. In Report of the 14th Meeting
of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. John Murray,
London, 1844, 311-390.
[3.] Lighthill, J. Waves in Fluids. Cambridge University Press,
1978.
[4.] Soomere, T. Nonlinear components of ship wake waves. Appl.
Mech. Rev., 2007, 60, 120-138.
[5.] Brown, E. D., Buchsbaum, S. B., Hall, R. E., Penhune, J. P.,
Schmitt, K. F., Watson, K. M. and Wyatt, D. C. Observations of a
nonlinear solitary wave packet in the Kelvin wake of a ship. J. Fluid
Mech., 1989, 204, 263-293.
[6.] Neuman, D. G., Tapio, E., Haggard, D., Laws, K. E. and Bland,
R. W. Observation of long waves generated by ferries. Canadian J. Remote
Sens., 2001, 27, 361-370.
[7.] Garel, E., Ferndndez, L. L. and Collins, M. Sediment
resuspension events induced by the wake wash of deep-draft vessels.
Geo-Marine Lett., 2008, 28, 205-211.
[8.] Soomere, T., P6der, R., Rannat, K. and Kask, A. Profiles of
waves from high-speed ferries in the coastal area. Proc. Estonian Acad.
Sci. Eng., 2005, 11, 245-260.
[9.] Forsman, B. From bow to beach. SSPA Highlights, 2001, No. 3,
4-5.
[10.] Balzerek, H. and Koslowski, J. Ship-induced riverbank and
harbour damage. Hydro Int., 2007, September, 2-4.
[11.] Parnell, K. E. and Kofoed-Hansen, H. Wakes from large
high-speed ferries in confined coastal waters: Management approaches
with examples from New Zealand and Denmark. Coastal Manage., 2001, 29,
217-237.
[12.] Parnell, K. E., McDonald, S. C. and Burke, A. E. Shoreline
effects of vessel wakes, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. J. Coastal
Res., 2007, Special Issue 50, 502-506.
[13.] Parnell, K. E., Delpeche, N., Didenkulova, I., Dolphin, T.,
Erm, A., Kask, A., Kelpsaite, L., Kurennoy, D., Quak, E., Rddmet, A.,
Soomere, T., Terentjeva, A., Torsvik, T. and ZaitsevaPdrnaste, I.
Far-field vessel wakes in Tallinn Bay. Estonian J. Eng., 2008, 14,
273-302.
[14.] Didenkulova, I., Zahibo, N., Kurkin, A., Levin, B.,
Pelinovsky, E. and Soomere, T. Runup of nonlinearly deformed waves on a
coast. Dokl. Earth Sci., 2006, 411, 1241-1243.
[15.] Schoellhamer, D. H. Anthropogenic sediment resuspension
mechanisms in a shallow microtidal estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.,
1996, 43, 533-548.
[16.] Soomere, T. and Rannat, K. An experimental study of wind
waves and ship wakes in Tallinn Bay. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Eng.,
2003, 9, 157-184.
[17.] Erm, A. and Soomere, T. The impact of fast ferry traffic on
underwater optics and sediment resuspension. Oceanologia, 2006, 48 (S),
283-301.
[18.] Didenkulova, I., Parnell, K. E., Soomere, T. and Pelinovsky,
E. Shoaling and runup of long waves induced by high-speed ferries in
Tallinn Bay. J. Coastal Res., 2009, Special Issue 56,491-495.
[19.] Kurennoy, D., Soomere, T. and Parnell, K. E. Variability in
the properties of wakes generated by high-speed ferries. J. Coastal
Res., 2009, Special Issue 56, 519-523.
[20.] Torsvik, T., Didenkulova, I., Soomere, T. and Parnell, K.
Variability in spatial patterns of long nonlinear waves from fast
ferries. Nordin. Process. Geophys., 2009, 16, 351-363.
[21.] IAHR working group on wave generation and analysis. List of
sea-state parameters. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. -ASCE, 1989,
115, 793-808.
[22.] Kharif, C. and Pelinovsky, E. Physical mechanism of the rogue
wave phenomenon. Ear. J. Mech. B Fluids, 2003, 22, 603-634.
Dmitry Kurennoy (a), Ira Didenkulova (a,b) and Tarmo Soomere (a)
(a) Institute of Cybernetics, Tallinn University of Technology,
Akadeemia tee 21, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; d.kurennoyCcbgmail.com
(b) Department of Nonlinear Geophysical Processes, Institute of
Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Uljanov Street 46, 603950
Nizhnij Novgorod, Russia; iraccbcs.ioc.ee
Table 1. Ships operating the Tallinn-Helsinki ferry route in
summer 2008
Ship Type Length, Width, Operating
m m speed,
knots
High-speed ferries
SuperSeaCat Monohull 100.3 17.1 35
Baltic Jet, Nordic Jet Catamaran 60 16.5 36
Conventional ferries with
increased cruise speed
Star Monohull 186.1 27.7 27.5
Superstar Monohull 176.9 27.6 27.5
Viking XPRS Monohull 185 27.7 25
Superfast Monohull 203.3 25 25.5-27.1