The Theater of Truth: The Ideology of (Neo) Baroque Aesthetics.
Viano Costello, Catherine
The Theater of Truth: The Ideology of (Neo) Baroque Aesthetics. By
William Egginton. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2010.
184 pp. ISBN: 978-080-476-954-9.
In recent years many scholars have debated the nature of the
relationship between the historical Baroque and the work of contemporary
"neobaroque" authors, especially those hailing from Latin
America. Egginton's work offers a fresh, philosophically-informed
perspective on Baroque and neobaroque aesthetics. The author claims that
the theatricality and extravagance we associate with both Baroque and
neobaroque works are the expression of a "problem of thought"
of modernity (1). Egginton explains this problem of thought as the
relationship between the way the world appears via the senses and the
way it actually exists apart from the senses. He builds on the thesis
from his previous book How the World Became a Stage, in which he argues
for a change in the vocabulary of modernity from one of subjectivity to
one of theatricality. According to Egginton, Baroque works approach this
fundamental "problem" with one of two strategies. The
"major strategy" confirms the existence of a higher truth or
authority hidden by the veil of deceiving appearances. The "minor
strategy" (inspired by Deleuze and Guattari's notion of
"minor literature") applies to works that revel in
representation itself, denying them the validity of the authority beyond
the realm of those appearances. While the former perspective implies the
promise of an essence that exists behind the curtain of representation,
the latter limits that promise. Egginton draws attention to the ways
that the minor strategy plays with the assumption of the major. In his
introduction he looks at two critics of Cervantes and examines their
different viewpoints, revealing that whether a work supports the major
or minor strategy is in the eye of the beholder.
Throughout The Theater of Truth, Egginton provides case studies of
these strategies in baroque aesthetics. Each chapter skillfully begins
and ends with an elaboration upon the meaning of the major and minor
strategies. In chapter 1 Egginton employs Baltasar Gracian's work
Criticon to refute Deleuze's rejection of the Cartesian distinction
between interior and exterior spaces, showing that Baroque artifice, as
depicted by the character Artemia, expresses the minor strategy. When
the hero Critilo observes Artemia creating a human being, Gracian
depicts the incompleteness of human existence and the role of art in
nature. In chapter 2 Egginton refers to Cervantes as the master
architect of the Baroque. He employs Cervantes' Novelas ejemplares
to frame his position that Derrida's notion of deconstruction is
already at work in the Baroque, thus demonstrating that the minor
strategy is born from within the major and explains that the baroque
aesthetic is constructed in two ways, the first hides the truth behind
representation, the second that our very access to that truth renders it
false by corrupting it. In chapter 3 Egginton reads Juan Ruiz de
Alarcon's La verdad sospechosa, Augustin Moreto's El desden
con el desden and the anonymous La estrella de Sevilla to illustrate
that, although canonical works are predominately in the mindset of the
major strategy, the inherent doubt present in baroque writing leaves
room for an interpretation in the minor strategy; the undoing of the
major. Egginton suggests that baroque theater exploits the search for
truth through appearances because the meta-theatrical structure at its
center toys with the notions of a primary and secondary reality. He
indicates that the theatrical nature of the Baroque reflects the
duplicitous character of baroque society as a whole and that, as Lacan
also argues, truth is constructed like fiction. In chapter 4 Egginton
examines Gongora's poetry which expresses the inherent complexity
and "opacity" of reality, defying readers' attempts to
penetrate the surface level of appearances/language (56). Gongora's
rejection of an absolute authority threatens the promise of the major
strategy and undermines baroque political discourse.
In chapter 5 Egginton develops his initial comparison between early
modernity and the contemporary period, introducing the idea of the
coloneobaroque, to link the aesthetic of the historical Baroque to that
of the postcolonial neobaroque. Drawing on work by Maravall, Kaup, and
Deleuze, he suggests that works from both periods share an aesthetic
preoccupation with theatricality, but that the political uses of that
aesthetic have changed over time. Quoting Kaup, he contends that the
Baroque "is the process of becoming minor" (71). In chapter 6
Egginton compares Calderon's and Borges' literary dreams to
show the inverse relationship of the major and minor strategies. The
dream in Calderon de la Barca's La vida es sueno reveals the
mindset of the major strategy because the reality perceived by
Segismundo is nothing more than a dream state controlled by the king.
Borges favors a "dream within a dream structure" in Las ruinas
circulares and Historia universal de la infamia, ignoring the promise of
the major strategy and showing the mindset of the minor, where the dream
itself is reality (96). In chapter 7 Egginton claims Pedro
Almodovar's cinema is currently one of the best examples of the
Baroque's minor strategy. In his movie La mala education, Almodovar
denies the promise of the major strategy by allowing his characters to
be who they represent themselves to be. Egginton claims that, similar to
Lacan, Almodovar believes that desire determines identity, ultimately
equating theatricality to reality.
The most fascinating aspect of Egginton's work is that he does
not attempt to simplify something that is inherently complex and open to
various interpretations. Rather, he offers varying perspectives to look
at the Baroque in all of its political, aesthetic, and philosophical
integrity. Because of this complexity, Egginton's book will serve
well those interested in exploring the tensions of baroque aesthetics.
His treatment of the major and minor strategies provides the reader with
a renewed interest in studying everything we call baroque.
CATHERINE VIANO COSTELLO
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill