Issues of integration in psychological counseling practice from pastoral counseling perspectives.
Pan, Peter Jen Der ; Deng, Liang-Yu F. ; Tsai, Shiou Ling 等
Client's perspective of counseling experience offers a
promising possibility for deeper understanding of the overall counseling
style in nature. Because counseling experience relates to client's
perceptions, affections, awareness, and attitudes of the counseling,
client's authentic voice is helpful to correctly identify the
essentiality of the counseling (Elliott & James, 1989). Therefore,
it is vital to use clients' perceptions of the counseling process
because these perceptions often differ from those of the counselor
(Paulson, Truscott, & Stuart, 1999). Using the perspectives of
Christian client participants who have experiences the psychological
counseling while taking the pastoral counseling course may be
constructive to further understand how those two are different from each
other in scope, focus, practice, and methods.
Although the integration of theology and psychology for
psychotherapeutic purposes began in the 1930s, both professional
scholars and practitioners found it difficult to integrate psychology
with theology, seeing the two aspects as completely different (Guild,
2002; Wade, Worthington Jr., & Vogel, 2007). Although programs in
both professions emphasizing the integration of pastoral and
psychological counseling had existed for over half a decade, the
empirical study that examined how such integration actually occurred is
limited (Chang, 2005; Hall, Ripley, Garzon, & Mangis, 2009). To fill
in the gap, there is a need to understand the commonality and uniqueness
of both professions from Christian client participants'
perspectives.
To date, pastoral counseling represents an attempt to hold together
both scientific and subjective accounts of human existence, which will
benefit through a clinical, ethical, and professional use of spiritual
resources (Richards & Bergin, 2005). Christian faith, as well as
spiritual resources, used properly and ethically, could have
contributions to the science of psychology. Although previous studies
confirmed that modern psychology had real value, it was not accepted by
some of the Christian scholars (Chang, 2005; Guild, 2002; Tan, 2009). In
contrast, pastoral counseling has not been accepted by most of the
clinical counseling psychologists in Taiwan, either. There is, however,
no difference between mainline and evangelical churches in the pastoral
counseling movement in Taiwan. Instead, pastoral counseling services in
urban churches are more popular than in suburban churches based on their
tremendous needs in Taiwan Christian communities.
In fact, the pastoral and psychological counseling are not really
against each other. They are very similar in some aspects and also very
different in some others. Practically, a Christian counselor does not
necessarily use the Bible as his or her only tool, yet their underlying
practice is based on biblical foundations (Tan, 2009). Contextually,
psychology and theology have common concerns and elements of focus such
as humanity, purpose, meaning, the human soul, emotions, the mind, human
behavior, philosophical perspectives on suffering, goodness, badness,
and human potential (Tan, 2001; 2009).
It is important to note that several authors (Chang, 2005; Tan,
2001, 2009) suggested that the difference between pastoral and other
forms of counseling lies within the goals that guide pastoral
counseling. One of the most significant differences between
psychological and pastoral counseling is related to the basic philosophy
of the counseling process (Hall et al., 2009). Pastoral counselors
recognize that everlasting love from God is powerful for healing, which
lays a solid foundation for building up pastoral counseling assumption.
Psychological counselors are used to interact with their clients
under a professional counseling relationship. This may differ from
pastoral counselors who reach out their clients beyond the scope of the
formal dialogues and counseling settings (Chang, 2005). In other words,
the professional relationship for psychological counselors is within the
counseling sessions that happened in the counseling room, whereas the
pastoral counselor may reach out to the client on several levels such as
praying for the clients before going to work, silently inviting
God's guidance during a session, or responding to the
intuitive/spirit-led sense of where hurt may be. In addition, pastoral
counselors differ from psychological counselors in that they
self-disclose and share their religious faith and values with their
clients. Instead, psychological counselors are constraint in the degree
to which they disclose and influence the client from counselor's
own perspectives.
Nevertheless, there are some commonalities that exist in the two
professions. First, both pastoral and psychological counseling are
dedicated to the best interests of their clients, to the law, to the
ethical standards of their governing bodies, to their specific
educational and training requirements, and to their contractual
obligations either in the church and/or in the workplace. Second,
confidentiality is an important part for both pastoral and psychological
counseling. The degree to which confidentiality is maintained depends on
three factors: the nature of the topics discussed, the character of the
counselor, and the legal and theological structures governing the
counseling relationship (Chang, 2005). Finally, the role of clinical
supervision is highlighted in both professions (Chang, 2005; Tan, 2009).
Because of the lack of empirical research in the area, Chang (2005)
contended that initial exploratory research is necessary. The purpose of
this study was to explore issues of integration in psychological
counseling practice from pastoral counseling perspectives. The result of
the study may answer the question of how the theology and the psychology
could be integrated within pastoral counseling from Christian clients
perspectives.
Method
Client-Participants
Twenty-two graduate students in a school of religion were invited
using a class announcement in a three-credit PCC offered in a mid-size
comprehensive university in Taiwan. Students were pre-screened in a
30-minute group interview by the primary researcher prior to the
counseling sessions. After the interview, two students dropped out from
this project because of personal concerns. Students were recruited to
participate in this project based on following criteria: being a
baptized Christian, having personal needs for receiving four
non-Christian counseling sessions in the Student Counseling Center
(SCC), and having pastoral counseling experiences as a volunteer
counselor in the church fellowship more than half a year. After signing
a consent form, 20 client-participants voluntarily participated in this
study. Participants' ages ranged from 29 to 55 years, with a mean
age of 35 years (SD = 6.6). Seventeen participants were married, and
three were unmarried. Of the 20 participants, eight are from Baptist
church, five from a Presbyterian church, two from a Protestant church,
four from a Spiritual church, and one from a Catholic church. Their
occupation included one preacher, one volunteer, one engineer, two
military instructors, two church assistants, three high school teachers,
two junior school teachers, and eight elementary school teachers. None
of the participants ever met their counselors before counseling
sessions.
Counselor-Participants
Seven counselor-participants, including one Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy, one Eclectic, two Integrative, and three Interpersonal
orientations, were on duty in the SCC during the semester year. Of the
seven counselors, three held doctors of philosophy in counseling, and
four were masters level counselors. Client-participants, based on their
time availability, were randomly assigned to one of the seven
counselor-participants after the intake procedure. The case load ranges
from 2 to 3 clients for each counselor and lasts four sessions within
two months. During counseling sessions, counselors did psychological
counseling based on their professional orientation. Although some of the
counselors were familiar with pastoral counseling, all of them did the
counseling work in a secular context. The information given to each
counselor prior to the first session was based on the intake report of
the SCC, in which no information was related to the purposes of the
study.
The Researchers
In qualitative research, researchers' roles were essential
because of their role functions in data collection and analysis
(Creswell, 2007). The qualitative research is interpretative, whereas
the researchers' judgments, values, and biases should be clearly
stated (Creswell, 2007). The primary researcher was one of the
supervisors who served as a participant observer. He gathered
information while being involved in the research field as well as in the
focus group interview. The other two researchers, doctoral-level senior
counseling psychologists, were qualitative oriented in research methods.
Their main tasks in the current study were conducting data analysis.
Because data are understood in the context of researchers' previous
experiences (Creswell, 2007), the researchers consulted with experts in
qualitative study to bracket their biases. Two research assistants,
master-degree counseling psychologists, were responsible for conducting
the in-depth interviews and transcribing data. Researchers' ages
ranged from 30 to 60 years, with a mean age of 43 years (SD = 16.6).
Data Collection
Grounded theory research, often referred to as the constant
comparative method, is a qualitative tradition built on compared
concepts (Creswell, 2007). Qualitative research is interested in process
and meaning rather than outcomes and products (Creswell, 2007).
Therefore, it is well fitted for this study on the basis of its purpose.
Grounded theory researchers use a set of procedures designed to give the
analytic process precision, rigor, and creativity, with a commitment to
focus on exploring and verifying concepts as they emerge through the
interactive and systematic processes of data collection and analysis
(Creswell, 2007). In the grounded theory tradition, researchers
typically conduct interviews during several visits to the field to
develop new research question and theory. In this study, data were
collected from the focus group interview, interactive process notes, and
open-ended questions. The interactive process note, which consists of
weekly written input, is a useful technique to write down
participants' on-going learning experience in the class. Then, the
instructor of the PCC makes comments to form an interactive feedback.
The premise in the use of the note was the belief that students learn as
they write. In considering the consistency and dependability of this
study, the focus group interviews were audio taped and transcribed. The
focus group interview was conducted two weeks after termination of the
four counseling sessions during the 14th week of the semester, in which
three questions serve as a framework:
1. Talking about your counseling experience as a client, how do you
perceive SCC, psychological counselor, and counseling process?
2. Overall, what are your perceptions and experiences of your
involvement in the counseling sessions?
3. Do you expect to talk about issues of Christian faith-related
topics during the counseling process? What are your counselor's
responses? Then, how do you respond to him/her?
To collect participants' class learning experiences, the
open-ended questions were completed after the PCC termination at the end
of the semester. Based on the purpose of exploring issues of integration
in psychological counseling practice from pastoral counseling
perspectives, three open-ended questions were framed and asked:
1. In comparison of your learning experience in the class as a
student with the counseling experience as a client, do you see any
similarity and difference in the basic assumption between pastoral and
psychological counseling?
2. Based on your learning experience, how do you see the
relationship between the pastoral counseling and psychological
counseling?
3. So far, how do you perceive the question that theology and
psychology could be integrated within pastoral counseling?
Data Analysis
In accordance with grounded theory procedures (Creswell, 2007), we
first read all of the participants' responses to have a general
sense of their perceptions. In this process, the two interviewers each
divided 20 transcripts into units that each contained one main idea
called meaning units (Creswell, 2007). We also used a two-line margin of
error in utilizing the interview transcripts. The agreement rate is 0.82
from the segmentation of 40 units from two randomly selected
transcripts, demonstrating an acceptable level of consensus in
identifying meaningful units.
Throughout this process of analysis, the researchers met regularly
to discuss, review, and analyze data in terms of common reactions,
concepts, and themes among all participants' responses to each
question. The open coding was completed by separating, identifying,
labeling, and categorizing data in terms of general themes. In open
coding, for example, a theme surrounding "clients' involvement
in the counseling process" was identified by researchers. Then, we
grouped all information that seemed to relate to this theme into one
large group named "clients' involvement in the counseling
process." We further used participants' responses to build
properties and provide characteristics within this domain to help
describe it.
In addition, axial coding was used to reconnect data and highlight
relations between categories and subcategories (Creswell, 2007). In
axial coding, for example, we explored and coded those aspects that
seemed to contribute to "clients' involvement in the
counseling process," such as counseling themes, tentative
participation, and first impression of counselors. In selective coding,
all information attained through previous data analyses was integrated
and utilized to develop clearer and more abstract explanations and
descriptions of emerging themes and related information. During the
process, we identified core categories, validated existing concepts, and
refined the properties and domains to define categories and concepts.
Thus, it was ensured that all categories would fully take in occurrences
and fully immerse into phenomena to gain as full, comprehensive, and
thorough of an understanding as possible. The analysis procedures were
stopped when redundancies and duplication of similar ideas, meanings,
experiences, and descriptions occurred among informants and when no more
new information was forthcoming. In other words, data analyses continued
until the categories were "saturated," that is, until further
categories that added to or changed the meaning of the analysis did not
seem to be forthcoming. Consequently, six selective categories were
constructed and identified affirmatively (see Appendix for complete list
of selective categories).
The prolonged engagement and triangulation were used to enhance the
credibility of the research findings (Creswell, 2007). The prolonged
engagement, which served as a form of clarification and verification,
involved the primary researcher's presence in an 18-week-long PCC
course and a 30-minute group interview with the participants.
Furthermore, the primary researcher obtained further direct and often
repeated affirmations of what he had heard, seen, or experienced with
respect to the phenomena under study after the counseling sessions to
ensure the credibility of findings.
For triangulation, this study utilized multiple data sources,
collection techniques, and methods of analysis. Multiple data sources
included the focus group interview (F-A-1), open-ended question (O-A-1),
and interactive process note (I-A-1). The first letter of the alphabet
in a pair of parentheses indicates where the data come from, and the
second letter of the alphabet reveals who the participant is. The order
of number identifies sequences. Finally, the peer debriefing, also known
as collegial challenges, was utilized in the current study. This refers
to the process when the researcher consults with peers or experts to
discuss various aspects of the study, including the emerging categories,
coding process, and any methodological concerns that may arise.
Results
Results from this study illuminated several concepts related to the
issues of integration in psychological counseling practice from pastoral
counseling perspectives. Data analyses yielded 54 meaning units or open
codes, which were grouped together meaningfully to form 16 axial
categories. Those were further grouped together to form six selective
categories. These findings, emerged as prominent and consistent,
included theoretical conceptualizations as the following: (a) Christian
client involvement, (b) Christian client expectations, (c) counselor
interventions, (d) establishing rapport, (e) similarities and
differences, and (f) integration between two professions.
Selective Category 1: The Christian Clients Involvement
Participants described that their own involvement in the counseling
session was related to their counseling experiences as a client. These
experiences resulted from four counseling sessions interacting with a
counselor in the SCC. Four axial categories, including first impression
of counselors, counseling experience as a client, counseling themes, and
tentative relationship, compose this selective category. Two open codes
contributed to the first axial category regarding the first impression
of the counselor. These themes were identified in this category because
those help the participants to get involved in the counseling
relationship and to self-disclose. One participant described, "My
first impression of the counselor is that she is quite young. I felt she
was very respectful, sincere and honest. She also demonstrated her
personal counseling style when she talked to me. Although she is not a
Christian, she affirmed my religion. She also gave me some
encouragements and affirmations in the critical period" (F-J-3).
Another indicated, "My counselor was warm, powerful, and
empathetic. I really enjoyed talking with her. Well, she really
performed her characteristics of the effective counselor" (O-G-6).
Three open codes contributed to the axial category of the
counseling experience as a client. Participants reported that the SCC
was cozy, friendly, and amiable. Objects displayed and arranged in the
counseling room provided a sense of warmth, helping atmosphere, and
professionalism for clients. One participant indicated, "The first
time I saw counseling center, the background music, the green plants,
the paintings on the wall, the color, the furniture.. .Wow, it was not
just an office" (F-A-9). Another stated, "What I felt in the
counseling center was its atmosphere. People here were really nice,
warm, and gentle. The counseling room was a projection of the counselor,
his counseling style, favorites, and characteristics. All these
environmental qualities in the counseling room provided clients with a
sense of being cared for. I just love it" (F-B-6).
However, conflicts and struggles emerged from some of the
participants' own pastoral counseling/psychological counseling
identity, which influenced their responses at the end of the first
session. One participant described, "Counseling was not worthwhile,
ineffective, or even a waste of time" (O-G-2). Another noted,
"Instead of engaging in a close relationship with a counselor, I
would rather trust in Lord, and have a trustworthy relationship with
God" (I-A-3).
Data collection from the focus group interview indicated that the
counseling themes included career development, marital relationship,
sense of loss, affective concern, interpersonal relationship, and
personal concerns. "The most troublesome issue to me is related to
interpersonal relationship. However, the topic we talked seemed to be
changeable and flexible. Following this context, we once talked about
issues of interpersonal relationship, affective concern, and personal
concerns" (F-T-2). Another stated, "The career development was
the first topic to me. After then, the marital relationship and sense of
loss from divorce event were treated" (F-S-3).
Three open codes contributed to the axial category of the tentative
relationship between clients and counselors. One participant offered,
"In the first counseling session, I was excited but a little bit
anxious about interacting with the counselor. Was she a Christian? Did
she understand what I meant from a Christian perspective?" (F-C-3).
Another noted, "Would I get hurt in the following sessions? I
hesitated whether to keep going on the rest of the counseling sessions
because my counselor was unfamiliar with my personal Christian
faith" (F-I-2). Based on the results, counselor/client matching is
not a new issue in the previous literature. However, the matching issue
between non-Christian counseling service and Christian participants is a
new topic for future research.
Selective Category 2: Christian Client Expectations
Themes in the second selective category were referred to how
participants expect to have spiritual dialogues with counselors. Two
axial categories, including participants' seeking for a dialogue of
Christian faith and religious consciousness compose this selective
category. Four open codes contributed to the first axial category. One
participant indicated, "The expectation about dialogues of
Christian faith with a counselor was very natural and spontaneous in
Christian daily life" (F-G-3). Another described, "I think, we
are encouraged to share our spiritual life and to learn from one another
in the church, our expectation for receiving feedbacks from Christians
was a regular part of the Christian life" (F-B-2).
Three open codes were included in the second axial category of the
religious consciousness, which reflects a core value of Christian's
life and relationship with God. One participant described, "In the
beginning of counseling, we were used to reveal our personal religion,
meanwhile, eager to find out counselor's religion through his or
her feedback" (F-O-2). Another indicated, "After receiving
counselor's responses, we then decide how to interact with the
counselor, that is, Christian-based or non-Christian-based
dialogues" (F-L-2). The other one noted, "I was so happy to
know my counselor is a devoted Christian. Although she identified
herself as a Christian, she did psychological counseling with
non-Christian oriented counseling sessions. She did not even use
Scripture nor led a prayer before or after the counseling session.
Honestly, I got a little disappointed in the first session"
(O-K-4).
Although participants' expectations for spiritual concerns and
dialogues were neglected in the beginning of the non-Christian
counseling, participants' negative comments and conflicts were
pretty normal reactions. One participant mentioned, "Although a
variety of interventions were used in the counseling process, I would
expect to read the Scripture and to pray at the end of each
session" (I-A-2). Another noted, "Our expectation to seek for
spiritual dialogues is important for us because it is part of my
Christian life. However, it seemed to be forgotten" (I-G-1).
Selective Category 3: Counselor Interventions
Themes in the third selective category were referred to counselor
interventions, including how and what counselors responded to
clients' expectations and how they developed a counseling
relationship in the early session. Three axial categories, including
counselors' responses to clients' expectations, basic
counseling skills and strategies, and specific counseling interventions,
compose this selective category. One participant described, "My
counselor said that it is good to have a religious faith. Although she
was a Christian, she did not respond to me when I mentioned about my
Christian identification during the initial counseling session. However,
she expressed that she really understood what I meant and said Christian
faith seems to bring you plenty of spiritual
resources''(F-T-2). Another noted, "My counselor's
responses were to encourage and foster a warm and helpful climate to
explore my personal concerns. She was really an empathetic school
counselor" (S-F-8).
Participants indicated that the use of the basic counseling skills
in the counseling sessions were useful and proper. One participant
described, "Based on my observation and learning experience, my
counselor used the following basic skills, including active listening,
open-ended questions, body language, paraphrasing, summarizing,
genuineness, acceptance, and empathetic understanding" (I-d-5). In
addition to specific techniques, she also described, "Counseling
strategies used by the counselor included questioning, probing,
challenging, teaching self-reflection, offering new perspectives, and
allowing emotional experiences" (I-d-6).
Several specific counseling interventions were reported in the
focus group interview, which included homework, cathartic techniques,
role playing, empty chair, solution-focused approach, psychological
testing, and goal-setting interventions. Although interventions used in
the counseling process were perceived as helpful and constructive,
dissatisfaction about the unfulfilled spiritual needs resulting from
lack of spiritual interventions, such as prayer and Scripture seemed to
be apparent and inevitable.
Selective Category 4: Establishing Rapport
Establishing rapport between a counselor and a client referred to
participants' perspectives on their counseling relationship in
terms of its meaning, quality, structure, commitment, and
counselor's empathetic understanding. Three axial categories
compose this selective category. Two meaning units contributed to the
axial category of empathetic understanding. Participants revealed that
their relationship with their counselor was changed and enhanced
dramatically because of the counselor's successful empathetic
understanding. One participant indicated, "It was like she was kind
of like, an angle sent by our Lord to help me empathetically. Therefore,
I was encouraged to open my heart and to engage in a trip of
self-discovery" (F-K-2). Another noted, "It was great to have
a counselor always demonstrate empathetic understanding of my concerns.
He, my counselor, helped me to learn how to relax by changing the
self-demanding behaviors. Although I was initially frustrated when the
counselor did not respond to my expectation to have a spiritual
dialogue, I have learned to participate in the counseling sessions"
(F-L-2). Although the barrier and gap may have existed between Christian
clients and psychological counselors, the use of empathetic
understanding was definitely helpful for improving counseling
relationship.
Two meaning units contributed to the axial category of the reliable
and constructive working alliance. Between sessions, most of the
participants indicated that they were very actively engaged in their
counseling process. They felt that counseling gave them new perspectives
to see their problems. As one participant described, "Thinking
about the counseling dialogues, reflecting what happened in the
counseling processes, and engaging in the counseling relationship was
helpful and constructive. It was a special professional relationship
which was built up only in the counseling room and would only be existed
in a short period of time" (I-H-2). Obviously, an alliance was
formed because an intensive interaction existed between the counselor
and the client.
Only when a reliable and constructive working alliance was formed,
the turning point for change might occur. Six meaning units contributed
to this axial category. Participants' perceptions of the change and
outcome were related to having new perspectives, emotional experiences,
fulfillment of self-expression of the inner world, observation of
personal problems, and changes made happen outside the healing scenario.
One participant indicated, "During the counseling process, my
counselor aimed at my value of separating the right from the wrong, and
the good from the bad. She discovered that there was always a strict
standard in my life. After talking to my counselor, I finally realized
what I need to learn is to please myself. I was free from a rigid,
fixed, and arbitrary rule" (O-3-2). Another noted, "After
counseling, I found out I've changed my attitude from passive to
positive. I had made up my mind to face my own problems which I had
never faced in the past" (I-1-12).
Selective Category 5: Similarities and Differences
An initial understanding of the similarities and differences
between two professions was gathered from participants' reflections
of class learning and counseling experiences as a client. Two axial
categories compose this selective category. Nine meaning units
contributed to the axial category of the uniqueness of the psychological
and pastoral counseling. One participant noted, "I think the
critical issue related to a basic theological point of view is
God's characteristics. More specifically, God is all powerful. God
knows everything, and His knowledge is infinite. However, psychological
counselor is a human being and thus his/her energy and professional
knowledge are limited in the field of the profession. Counselors can do
something for their clients in the professional relationship, but not
everything" (I-F-13). Another noted, "It is obvious that the
pastoral counseling focuses on the spiritual cares, the teaching, and
the relationship with God; while the psychological counseling emphasizes
on the psychological aspects and uses various counseling skills and
strategies in the counseling process" (I-C-9). A devoted Christian
participant indicated, "Pastoral counselors usually use
self-disclosure, share their own spiritual experiences, and Scripture;
while clinical counselors utilize more counseling skills, strategies,
and confrontation in the counseling process" (O-E-2).
Four meaning units contributed to the axial category of
commonality. One participant offered, "It was great to find out
that both counseling professions can empower their clients either
through effective intervention or reunion of the relationship with
God" (F-K-10). Another noted, "I found that both counseling
professions provided a positive and immediate supporting system for
clients. It was great to have that experience. I thought helping clients
to solve their problems, valuing freedom of choice for their clients,
respecting clients' choices, and even taking own responsibility was
formal procedures for both" (I-I-6). One senior school teacher
mentioned, "Both professions, stress the importance of establishing
rapport, have the same goal to help people overcome their problems, find
meaning and joy in life, and become mentally healthy and well-adjusted
individuals" (O-G-8).
Selective Category 6: Integration Between Two Professions
Two axial categories compose this selective category. Four meaning
units contributed to the axial category of the essentiality of
integration. One participant mentioned, "What I am thinking about
the integration between the two professions is that it is natural in
nature, because all truth comes from God, including truth about the
people who God creates" (I-D-12). Another noted, "Based on my
learning experience in the class and my observation in counseling
sessions, I think the way to integrate the two professions is necessary
and accessible, because efforts to combine counseling with Christian
religious perspectives are sometimes called integration" (O-E-6).
The other one noted, "What I thought is that professional dialogues
between two professions are tremendously needed. The dialogue is not
only an echo to clients' needs, but also a testimony for
integration in a transit modern society. This will bridge an access for
mutual integration. If not changed today, it must be about improving
tomorrow" (I-I-9).
Self-reflection and transfer were recognized as participants'
personal perception of the integration through focusing on thoughts,
feelings, and ideas in which they can identify in their counseling
professional development or apply to future counseling service. Three
meaning units contributed to this axial category. One participant
described, "Self-reflection is more than just a cognitive process,
but was ideally translated into behavioral transformation. One of the
functions is to integrate counseling knowledge into counseling practice.
In terms of self-reflection, I found previous experiences of being with
younger brothers and sisters in the church were congruent with the
integration knowledge I learned this semester" (O-L-5). Another
noted, "To see is to believe. It was great to have a sort of
counseling experience as a client in SCC as well as a student in PCC. It
seems like a sandwich design of learning process, in which three
ingredients were included: prior knowledge of counseling, psychological
counseling experience as a client, and learning experience in PCC. It
makes sense to me the distinct domain between two professions"
(O-G-3).
There were also anxiety emerged around the participants. One
participant offered, "Although helping someone is valuable through
empathetic understanding, unconditional regards, and acceptance in the
counseling process, there was anxiety and difficulty to make a decision
whether to use solely the psychological counseling or not" (F-F-8).
The underlying assumption is that most of the students will transfer
what they have learned in PCC to their career. However, the fear of
misuse the profession does exist, hence there is a need for repeated
practice and being supervised. One participant noted, "Compared to
my education-majored background, the concepts and knowledge I learned in
PCC are different from what I have learned in previous courses. I have
difficulty in using the material in meaningful ways later in other
contexts. To me, an experiential supervisor is helpful to my
professional growth" (F-N-8).
Discussion
This study explored issues of integration in psychological
counseling practices from pastoral counseling perspectives. Results of
this study may contribute to a deeper understanding of Christian
graduate students' experiences in non-Christian psychological
counseling as a client and their reflections on the PCC. Results
highlighted the process of establishing a reliable and constructive
working alliance, similarities and differences between the two
professions, and perceptions on integrating both professions into
applications. Hence, integrating theology and psychology into pastoral
counseling seems to be accessible.
Although most of the participants entered counseling session
believing that commitment was important when seeking help, some of them
entered with a sense of anxiety about psychological service provided by
a non-Christian counselor. The participants were initially hesitant
whether counselors would appreciate the significance of their Christian
backgrounds because of fear of being devaluated or misunderstood. The
result confirmed previous findings in this area that clients often make
subtle assessments based on observations of their counselors as to
whether sharing religious faith materials is welcome (Magaldi-Dopman,
Park-Taylor, & Ponterotto, 2011). Indeed, they reported that a
tentative relationship between counselors and clients was formed because
of the lack of a dialogue on Christian faith or spiritual concerns in
the initial counseling session. Based on our findings, the situation
sometimes required counselors' direct intervention by an open
discussion and using empathetic understanding. These sorts of open
discussions led clients to know that their counselors understood what
they felt. Hence, the efficient way to build up a rapport between a
counselor of secular context and Christian client is to overcome the
transitional period through a frank dialogue with empathy in the early
counseling sessions.
Within the counselor interventions mentioned earlier,
counselors' responding to client expectations was a dominant and
critical factor to impact on Christian clients' involvement in the
counseling session. Noticeably, clients frequently expressed their needs
in seeking a discussion of Christian faith and concerns. Indeed, sharing
Christian materials, including Scripture reading, prayer, insights of
Gods' words, and dialogues, have become a popular issue in their
lives, hence supporting Christian clients' tremendous needs in the
counseling relationship (Magaldi-Dopman et al., 2011; Walker, Gorsuch,
& Tan, 2004; Young, Cashwell, Wiggins-Frame, & Belaire, 2002).
This suggests that religious dialogues in counseling are sensitive and
may activate feelings within the client, which is supported by this
present study.
From this perspective, the initial counseling sessions may be
considered a transitional period to facilitate the tentative
relationship to a reliable working alliance between a counselor of
secular context and Christian counselees. Therefore, counselor's
flexibility, that is, using the spiritual sources such as prayer and
Scripture, contemplation and meditation, sacred writings, forgiveness,
and repentance, is suggested if working with a heterogeneous client
population such as Christians (Richards & Bergin, 2005; Tan, 2009).
The importance of this finding adds to the counseling literature to
suggest that counselors need to increase their knowledge, skills, and
awareness in accordance with clients' religious identities and
expectations. If it is not applicable, utilizing the empathetic
understanding is effective and constructive for all counselors. In fact,
discussion of the client's spiritual concerns should not completely
replace psychotherapy in the counseling session. This assumption was
supported by participants' indication that their counseling
relationship with counselors changed dramatically from time to time and
emphasized the importance of the experience of empathetic understanding
from their counselors. Specific factors, such as counseling environment,
basic counseling skills, and the first impression of the counselor, were
perceived by clients as helpful and impressive, but clients rarely
attributed any of those as factors in building up a reliable and
constructive working alliance. This finding supports Chang's (2005)
suggestions that empathetic understanding is the central part of
interventions.
Based on participants' responses, findings indicated that
pastoral and psychological counseling do have some overlapped parts. The
results supported the view in previous studies that pastoral counselors,
as well as psychological counselors, provide psychological guidance to
people who are struggling with a variety of psychological issues, such
as depression, trauma, broken marriage, and relationship recovery
(Chang, 2005; Tan, 2001). Furthermore, this research further classifies
similarities between the two professions as follows: both professions
emphasize simultaneously on the basic counseling skills in the
counseling process; accomplish a sense of empowerment; provide a
positive and immediate support for a variety of clients; facilitate
clients to make their own decisions and take responsibility; respect
clients' decision making; and invite clients to get involved in the
counseling sessions through formal procedures such as intake,
registration, waiting list, and filling out a consent form. Finally,
both professions make every effort to provide a helpful intervention for
their clients.
However, there are differences as well. The description of the
uniqueness in the pastoral and psychological counseling can be divided
into three clusters. The first cluster is related to philosophical
assumptions. The former focuses on God's power and characteristics,
whereas the latter focuses on facilitating personal growth and strength
to make changes. Particularly, the former uses God's words and love
to comfort and to inspire people, whereas the latter uses a variety of
strategies based on different counseling theories to help clients deal
with their problems. In other words, the pastoral counseling mainly
reconciles a new relationship with our Lord and facilitates a new life
in accordance with the Bible and Christian faith. In contrast,
psychological counseling is based on psychological and counseling
theories and principles. These findings support the literature that
pastoral counseling is mainly based on biblical foundations (Aten &
Hernandez, 2004; Tan, 2001, 2009), which is absolutely reliable and
authoritative in all its teachings.
The second cluster is referred to the counselor interventions and
boundary. The former focuses on the spiritual cares, teaching,
self-disclosure, and sharing their own spiritual experiences, whereas
the latter emphasizes the psychological cares, facilitation, and
interaction. The former builds up a close relationship through
God's love and maintains this relationship much longer than
counseling sessions. Furthermore, the relationship that exists in the
pastoral counseling is not limited only in the counseling room but also
allows for a dual relationship in a church context, which is consistent
with previous findings (Collins, 1988; Tan, 2001, 2009). Pastoral
counselors are allowed to have accesses and relationships with clients
beyond the counseling settings (Hall et al., 2009).
The third cluster is regarding the counseling goals. Based on the
results of this study, the former is to generate spiritual resources and
new Christian faith perspectives, and the latter is to work through
problems and concerns, to relieve emotions, and to think about things
differently. However, one unique aspect of pastoral counseling suggested
that the everlasting love from God is powerful for healing, and the
ultimate goal of Christian counseling must always be to assist the
client in becoming more like Jesus Christ (Chang, 2005; Hall et al.,
2009). Such suggestions were not found in the psychological counseling.
As Tan (2001, 2009) indicated, an essential part of integration is
to examine our own relationship with God and others. A further
development of implicit integration strategies is suggested by our
findings regarding the similarity and difference between two
professions. Pastoral counselors may positively extend the use of the
similarity and keenly utilize the difference for clients who are not
interested in religious or spiritual resources (Chang, 2005; Tan, 2001).
For other clients who are more religiously oriented, the pastoral
counselors might adopt explicit integration strategies.
Indeed, Hall et al. (2009) suggested that facilitating integration
and concepts of integration was practical strategies for training an
integrative counselor. Tan (2009) further addressed that the use of
integrative supervision was helpful and useful to integrate both
professions. The findings of this study indicated that the
self-reflection and transfer from class learning and counseling
experience were vital for integrating theology and psychology into
pastoral counseling through a sandwich design of learning process. A
further study to explore such sandwich design and to compare different
training programs may be constructive to develop a complete training
model. Further study is needed, however, before any solid conclusions
can be made regarding the questions of philosophical assumptions,
participant clients' expectations, client-counselor religious
matching, and self-reflections for integration.
Regarding the use of the grounded theory methods, there are several
limitations that need to be noted. The findings should be interpreted
with caution because of the retrospective reports, the lack of
counselors' perceptions, the small sample size, the homogeneity of
the sample, and the limited number of counseling sessions. First, the
open-ended questions and the retrospective nature of relying on
participants' self-reports may present some sort of risks, such as
the important aspects or nuances of particular changing experiences
being forgotten or misremembered. Second, this investigation is focused
on client participants' perspectives. The lack of counselors'
data in understanding the participants' perceptions may result in a
methodological concern. Third, because of the small sample size and its
relative homogeneity, replication is recommended with larger and more
diverse samples. Large samples can provide more precise estimates of
population parameters. Moreover, the homogeneity of Christian graduate
students may affect the participants' perceptions of their
counseling experiences as a client and class learning experiences.
Particularly, participants being in a class together on the PCC would
somehow influence one another. Thus, the data collection was presumably
impacted. Forth, the length of four counseling sessions may limit
participants' perceptions and reflections regarding the integrative
issues in psychological counseling perspectives. To collect in-depth and
representative data, it is suggested for future research to increase the
number of treatment to more than six sessions. Finally, this study was
conducted in Taiwan and may therefore be affected by cultural factors.
Although a variety of participants' church backgrounds were
included in the samples such as the Presbyterian, Baptist, Protestant,
and Spiritual, cultural influences on issues of integration may
inevitably exist. Replications in other locations are required to verify
the results. Despite these limitations, the results may still have an
important impact on the counseling practices.
The results of this study suggest important implications for
counseling practitioners. First, because of the necessity of sharing
Christian faith in the counseling process for Christian clients, it is
strongly suggested that psychological counselors may invite an open
discussion about the intervention format, the non-Christian
counseling-oriented approach, professional ethics, and neutral value.
However, if it is necessary, referral to pastoral counseling should be
considered. Second, to build up a reliable and constructive working
alliance, for Christian clients and psychological counselors, the
importance of using empathetic understanding in counseling intervention
is emphasized. Third, for pastoral counselors working with Christian or
non-Christian clients, it is advisable to use prayer and scripture for
clients in either explicit or implicit ways depending on clients'
needs (Tan, 2009; Weld & Eriksen, 2007). Finally, counseling
scholars and practitioners should sensitively consider Christian
clients' religious identity and spiritual concern, and increase
multicultural counseling knowledge, skills, and awareness
(Magaldi-Dopman et al., 2011). Under this context, incorporating
findings of this study to counseling training program seems crucial to
the development of both professions.
Appendix
Selective, axial, and open categories for integrating pastoral and
psychological counseling
Selective Axial Open
1. Christian 1-1 First 1-1-1 Personal counseling
client impression style
involvement of counselors
1-1-2 Characteristics of the
effective counselor
1-2 Counseling 1-2-1 Counseling environment
experience as a
client 1-2-2 Participants'
impressions of the first
counseling session
1-2-3 Participants have
personal conflicts and
struggles
1-3 Counseling 1-3-1 Participants'
themes perceptions on the
counseling topics included
career development, marital
relationship, sense of loss,
affective concern,
inter-personal relationship,
and personal concerns
1-4 Tentative 1-4-1 Participants were
relationship vulnerable in relationship
with counselors
1-4-2 Anxious and nervous
reactions
1-4-3 Participants
identified counselors'
religious orientation
2. Christian 2-2 Religious 2-2-1 The expectation of
client consciousness receiving feedbacks from
expectations Christians was a regular
part of the Christian life
2-2-2 Client-counselor
matching issues based on
the Christian-oriented
faith
2-2-3 Separate pastoral
and psychological counseling
3. Counselor 3-1 Counselors' 3-1-1 The positive
interventions responses to interpretation
clients'
expectations 3-1-2 Convey open and
nonjudgmental manners
3-1-3 Encourage and foster
exploration
3-1-4 Empathetically
understanding
3-2 Basic 3-2-1 The use of basic
counseling skills counseling skills
and strategies
3-2-2 Counseling strategies
used by counselors
3-3 Specific 3-3-1 Facilitate empowerment
counseling and assertiveness
interventions
3-3-2 Homework, catharsis,
role playing, empty chair,
solution-focused approach,
psychological testing, and
goal-setting interventions
4. Establishing 4-1 Empathetic 4-1-1 A key point for
rapport understanding developing counseling
relationship
4-1-2 The use of empathetic
understanding was helpful
for developing counseling
relationship
4-2 The reliable 4-2-1 Participants were very
and constructive actively engaged in their
working alliance counseling process
4-2-2 They felt that
counseling gave them new
perspectives to see their
problems
4-3 The changes 4-3-1 A trip of
and outcomes self-discovery
4-3-2 Having new
perspectives
4-3-3 Emotional experiences
4-3-4 Fulfillment of
self-expression of the
inner world
4-3-5 Observation of personal
problems
4-3-6 Changes happened
outside the healing scenario
5. Similarities 5-1 The 5-1-1 God is all powerful
and differences uniqueness and unlimited.
5-1-2 God's characteristics
5-1-3 Psychological and
pastoral counselors' roles
and functions
5-1-4 Pastoral counselors
focus on the spiritual care,
the teaching, and the
relationship with God
5-1-5 Psychological
counselors emphasize the
psychological aspects and
use various counseling
skills and strategies.
5-1-6 Pastoral counselors
frequently use
self-disclosure to share
their spiritual experience
and Scripture
5-1-7 Psychological
counselors utilize more
counseling skills,
strategies, and
confrontations in the
counseling process
5-1-8 Most of the pastoral
counselors discuss religious
or spiritual issues and do
it openly, directly, or
systematically using
spiritual resources like
prayer and Scripture
5-1-9 Psychological
counselors treat clients
psychologically or physically
and use various psychological
resources such as peer
supportive systems, positive
reinforcement, and
effective interventions
5-2 The 5-2-1. Both professions
commonality accomplish a sense of
empowerment through
effective intervention or
reunion of the relationship
with God
5-2-2 The similarities
include helping clients to
solve their problems, valuing
freedom of choice for their
clients, respecting clients'
choices, and encouraging
clients to take own
responsibility
5-2-3 Both professions
stress the importance of
establishing rapport
5-2-4. Both professions deal
with clients' problems
either psychologically or
mentally
6. Integration 6-1 The 6-1-1. The integration is
essentiality of natural in nature
integration
between 6-1-2 The way to integrate
psychological is necessary and accessible
counseling and
pastoral 6-1-3 Both professions made
counseling positive contributions to
counseling
6-1-4. One of the functions
is to integrate counseling
knowledge into counseling
practice
6-2 The 6-2-1 Self-reflection is
self-reflection more than just a cognitive
and transfer process
6-2-2 A sandwich design of
learning process
6-2-3 I have difficulty in
using the material in
meaningful ways later in
other contexts
References
Aten, J. D., & Hernandez, B. C. (2004). Addressing religion in
clinical supervision: A model. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and
Practice, 41, 152-160.
Chang, T. C. (2005). Pastoral counseling: A helping model for
changing life. Taipei, China: China Evangelical Seminary.
Collins, G. R. (1988). Christian counseling: A comprehensive guide.
(Rev. ed.). Dallas, TX: Word.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design:
Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Elliott, R., & James, E. (1989). Varieties of the client
experience in psychotherapy: An analysis of the literature. Clinical
Psychology Review, 9, 443-467.
Guild, W. M. (2002). Christianity and psychology: Integration with
a counseling view. Retrieved May 7, 2010, from
http://www.tiu.edu/cmx/seniors02/guild.htm
Hall, E. L., Ripley, J. S., Garzon, F. L., Mangis, M. W. (2009).
The other side of the podium: Student perspectives on learning
integration. The Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37, 15-27.
Magaldi-Dopman, D., Park-Taylor, J., & Ponterotto, J. G.
(2011). Psychotherapists' spiritual, religious, atheist or agnostic
identity and their practice of psychotherapy: A grounded theory study.
Psychotherapy Research, 21, 286-303.
Paulson, B. L., Truscott, D., & Stuart, J. (1999).
Clients' perceptions of helpful experiences in counseling. Journal
of Counseling Psychology, 46, 317-324.
Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (2005). A spiritual strategy
for counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association
Tan, S.-Y. (2001). Integration and beyond: Principled,
professional, and personal. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 20,
18-28.
Tan, S.-Y. (2009). Developing integration skills: The role of
clinical supervision. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 37, 54-61.
Wade, N. G., Worthington Jr., E. L., & Vogel, D. L. (2007).
Effectiveness of religiously tailored interventions in Christian
therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 91-105.
Weld, C., & Eriksen, K. (2007). Christian clients'
preferences regarding prayer as a counseling intervention. Journal of
Psychology and Theology, 35, 328-341.
Walker, D. F., Gorsuch, R. L., & Tan, S. Y. (2004).
Therapists' integration of religious and spirituality in
counseling: A meta-analysis. Counseling & Values, 49, 69-80.
Young, J. S., Cashwell, C., Wiggins-Frame, M., & Belaire, C.
(2002). Spiritual and religious competencies: A national survey of
CACREP-Accredited programs. Counseling & Values, 47, 22-47.
Peter Jen Der Pan
Liang-Yu F. Deng
Shiou Ling Tsai
Jenny S. S. Yuan
Chung Yuan Christian University
Authors
Peter J. D. Pan (Master in Counselor Education, University of
Wisconsin) is a Professor of the College of Humanities and Education at
Chung Yuan Christian University and editor of the Taiwan Journal of
General Education. Dean Pan's interests include group process,
verbal interaction, and integration between Christian pastoral and
secular psychological counseling.
Liang-Yu F. Deng (Ph.D. in Family Study, Kansas State University)
is a Professor of the College of Humanities and Education at Chung Yuan
Christian University and a licensed counseling psychologist. Dr.
Deng's interests include family counseling. parenting, verbal
interaction, and group counseling process.
Shiou-Ling Tsai (Ph.D. in Educational Psychology & Counseling,
National Taiwan Normal University) is an Associate Professor in the
Center for Teacher Education and director of the Student Counseling
Center at Chung Yuan Christian University. Dr. Tsai's interests
include Solution-focused Brief therapy, Theories & Practicum of
Counseling, and counselor training and supervision.
S. S. Jenny Yuan (Master in Guidance and Counseling, National
Pingtung University of Education) is a licensed counselor in the Student
Counseling Center at Kainan University. Her interests include group
counseling, career guidance and counseling, Solution-focused Brief
therapy, and counselor training and supervision.
Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to Peter
Jen Der Pan, Ph.D, College of Humanities and Education, Chung Yuan
University, 200 Chung Pei Road, Chung Li, Taiwan; jender@cycu.edu.tw.