首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月21日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Case for God.
  • 作者:Sutton, Geoffrey W.
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Psychology and Christianity
  • 印刷版ISSN:0733-4273
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 期号:March
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:CAPS International (Christian Association for Psychological Studies)
  • 摘要:Karen Armstrong is a leader in religious affairs. She is a best-selling author with demonstrated expertise in the monotheistic faiths. In addition to her many speaking engagements, she is a United Nations Ambassador for the Alliance of Civilizations.

The Case for God.


Sutton, Geoffrey W.


THE CASE FOR GOD. Karen Armstrong. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2009. Pp xviii+ 406, hardback, $27.95. ISBN 978-0-307-26918-8.

Karen Armstrong is a leader in religious affairs. She is a best-selling author with demonstrated expertise in the monotheistic faiths. In addition to her many speaking engagements, she is a United Nations Ambassador for the Alliance of Civilizations.

The Case for God is a misnomer. In the introduction, Armstrong explains her plan to review the history of religious thinking, which illustrates her theme that things have changed in recent decades. Before the age of reason, people sought meaningful ways to view life events; hence, mythos provided guidance and functioned as a primitive psychology. As people learned ways to control their lives and the environment, a greater emphasis on logos (reason) developed. Eventually, these two perspectives appeared disparate. An important part of her thesis is that the notion of belief has changed. Religion has been rationalized and is responsible for the recent rise of fundamentalism and atheism. The Case for God becomes a case for understanding the perspectives of religious others derived from a humble stance toward what can be known in contrast to the certitude presented by religious fundamentalists and secular scientists. "There is a long religious tradition that stressed the importance of recognizing the limits of our knowledge, of silence, reticence, and awe. That is what I hope to explore in this book (xviii)."

Armstrong divides her work into two major parts. The first six chapters trace the origins of religious responses as evident from prehistoric art through the variations of sacred teachings and more importantly the development of rituals and disciplines that afforded everyman a cultural path to the sacred. She demonstrates a broad knowledge of Eastern Religions, which precedes her analysis of more recent and familiar Western monotheisms. Following these early chapters that read more like a history of religion, a more thematic approach emerges as she addresses the reason and faith narratives of Greek and Jewish origin. I found the death of Socrates a particularly apt symbol of the myth and logos tension that has repeatedly led to destruction of those who question prevailing dogma.

Part two consists of six chapters focused on science and religion. Armstrong aptly traces the rise of secularism, rational faith, and atheism in Western cultures. She offers a selective review of ideas prototypical of the Renaissance, Reformation, and the Scientific Revolution. Toward the end of the section, Armstrong presents the recent tension between religious and atheist fundamentalists who argue their respective positions based on literal interpretations of scriptures and a sense that statements from the sacred texts are truth propositions. She finds both sides guilty of selective reading and biased interpretations and calls for an appreciation of the limits of knowledge with reference to postmodernist thinkers. In the Epilogue, Armstrong suggests a rapprochement founded on the contributions of religion and science to human well-being. It is a celebration of values and a plea for humility.

Readers of JPC will find the Case for God an informed perspective on the tension that exists between militant fundamentalists and equally militant atheists. At times the mythos--logos dichotomy is a little too neat. The historical record documents the vigor with which religious leaders condemned and slaughtered others over differences in belief. Thus it seems plausible that literal interpretations of sacred texts have been a part of religious thinking for millennia. Although her worldview is not compatible with that of Christian Evangelicals, Armstrong's perspective on the concepts of faith, belief, and reason offers value to those attempting to integrate Christianity and psychological science. The book also offers a stimulus for clinicians who assess the rationality of their client's beliefs.

Reviewed by Geoffrey W. Sutton (Evangel University, Springfield, MO).
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有