Baroque folds: Jonathan Koestle-Cate examines the vertiginous work of Anna Freeman Bentley.
Koestle-Cate, Jonathan
The north transept of Chichester's 11th-century Norman and
Gothic Cathedral is currently host to an arresting element of the
Baroque. This at least is the language often used to describe the work
of the London-based artist, Anna Freeman Bentley. Descent is an 11m
high, eight-panel painting, tapering from base to apex. Rapidly executed
in watery oils over a brief period of just two days, it depicts an
improbably high spiral staircase, decorated with ornate iron balustrades
in the Parisian style, highly polished reflective steps and banisters,
copper carpet rails, and a white plaster reverse, rising to a curved
aperture in the ceiling, all set against a background of golden-framed
paintings. The staircase was modelled on one found in the Gustave Moreau
Museum in Paris, formerly the family home of the Symbolist painter, only
vastly extended, turning a single spiral into a series of tumbling
twists and turns within an impossibly gigantic domestic interior. A
significant aspect of Descent is the contrast shown between the rhythmic
solidity of the wooden steps and the contorted fluidity of their plaster
underside. It is this abstract, vortical shape threading each level
together like stretched canvas that draws the eye, creating a kind of
curvature, or folding, of form within the pictorial space.
Descent was created during a year's residency at the Florence
Trust, an artists' studio and training ground for early career
artists based in St Saviour's Church, London and first shown in the
deconsecrated Neo-Gothic space as part of the final exhibition. The
setting in Chichester Cathedral proves more challenging. Here the work
finds itself in a visually busier context, flanked on one side by the
treasury, visible through an iron grille and on the other by a wall of
16th-century portraits of Chichester's bishops, and adjacent to a
Gothic window of clear glass, which at certain times of the day mists
the painting with ambient light. As Anthony Cane, the Chancellor of
Chichester Cathedral, reminded me, this is one of the challenges for art
works in churches, rarely subject to the environmental controls of a
gallery, but also one of its advantages as changing conditions literally
throw new light upon the work.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
As one approaches the painting the bottom panel visually sits at
ground level, tempting the viewer with the possibility of walking into
the painting and beginning an ascent of one's own. The work is
called Descent however and thus we have to reorientate our view of it.
Though one naturally lifts one's eyes upwards, the inference of the
title is of a movement downwards. Within the context of the cathedral
(and with William Blake's spiralling staircase in mind), the
precedent here is clearly Jacob's Ladder, that oneiric conduit
between Earth and Heaven. Typically, whether in the writings of Irenaeus
or Origen, Gregory of Nazianzus or John Chrysostom, among others, as an
allegory of the spiritual life the ladder is seen as a means of ascent,
whether by acts of virtue or by grace. Yet in Genesis we are plainly
told that Jacob saw angels 'ascending and descending' (Genesis
28:12), an inference picked up in John's Gospel where Jesus himself
is pictured as the ladder upon which 'the angels of God' are
pictured 'ascending and descending on the Son of Man' (John
1:51). A relationship between Earth and Heaven seems to be at stake in
this image, an intercourse between two realms rather than an exhortation
to ascend, in which Christ himself acts as an intermediary between God
and mankind.
As a painter Freeman Bentley generally works in oil on hardboard,
which provides a smooth surface over which thin washes of colour can be
brushed and dragged. She prefers to work at speed, each painting usually
completed on the day it is begun. This approach encourages impulsive
decision-making and exaggerates the sense of drama, movement and energy
in her works. Although essentially figurative, her paintings have been
described as 'dense to the point of abstraction' (1). Watery
washes of a generally muted colour palette abut intensely dark, shadowy
passages or sudden moments of luminous colour, their textural,
brushmarked surfaces disclosing optical depth. This is amplified by her
frequent depiction of mirrored and reflective surfaces, introducing a
note of visual disorientation. The visual field is fractured,
fragmented, fissured, yet the works do not fall into disunity or
fragment into incoherence. These are highly structured, tightly composed
images, all serving to produce visually rich, if not easily legible
worlds. Her paintings typically engage with interior spaces, always
unpeopled and often visually complex, ranging from the jumbled clutter
of junk shops to the ornate flamboyance of 17th-century church
interiors. These atmospheric, unpopulated interiors are ambiguous
spaces, sometimes evoking the eerie emptiness of abandoned buildings,
but more often than not claustrophobic, stiflingly overloaded with
visual stimuli. In each case she sees her work principally as a
visualisation of longing.
However, in discussions with the artist about the ideas that
motivate her paintings there is another theme that repeatedly surfaces:
that of the Baroque. What is it about the Baroque that she finds so
inspirational and what justification can be found for this assertion?
Reading around its history it soon becomes clear that it is notoriously
difficult to distil it into a single idea or set of ideas. Attempts to
establish any fixed and definitive meaning appear futile, since, it is
claimed, the Baroque is inherently 'volatile and unstable'
(2). Nevertheless, in Robert Harbison's fascinating study of the
Baroque a number of defining features are identified that closely accord
with Freeman Bentley's paintings: 'bold chiaroscuro,
disorienting asymmetries, exaggerated contrasts, decorative and
expressionistic use of formerly structural elements' with an
emphasis on 'subjective and perspectival vision' (3). But it
is the affective rather than stylistic qualities of the Baroque that are
of particular relevance to her work. Above all, Freeman Bentley finds in
Heinrich Wolfflin's classic definition of the baroque effect ideas
that resonate with her own:
The momentary impact of baroque is powerful, but soon leaves us
with a certain sense of desolation. It does not convey a state of
present happiness, but a feeling of anticipation, of something yet
to come, of dissatisfaction and restlessness rather than
fulfilment. We have no sense of release, but rather of having been
drawn into the tension of an emotional condition' (4)
Freeman Bentley sometimes frames her practice within a reading of
the Baroque as theatrical excess and visual saturation. This reference
to Wolfflin, however, encourages a reading of her work in which mood,
affect and longing come to the fore. Even so, the negativity evident in
his view of the Baroque is countered in Freeman Bentley's oeuvre by
a sense of hope and anticipation. Ben Quash has written of the
provocations her paintings make to this notion of the Baroque through
their recourse to 'a strange remembering of times past and a
hopeful looking forward into eternity', a future-oriented tendency
he labels 'towardness' (5). One might speak, for example, of
an ever-present sense of the infinite as a hallmark of the Baroque,
above all the intrusion or irruption of the infinite and eternal into
the everyday world. Descent is described in precisely such terms on the
cathedral's own web pages. In somewhat hyperbolic language it
claims that the drama of the work 'overpowers the viewer and reacts
with the space', and here is the key phrase, 'pointing our
gaze towards infinity'. For Wolfflin, such judgements marked the
Baroque as a regressive movement away from the clarity of the
Renaissance. In his view it is a sign of decadence and aesthetic decline
that baroque space is 'unlimited and undefined', its depth
offering only obscurity as 'the gaze is led toward infinity'
(6). However, if the infinite is at work in Descent perhaps it is not in
the manner that Wolfflin's negative assessment supposes. After all,
though dramatically extended, the staircase clearly has two levels, a
lower and upper floor, a beginning and an end. The apex of the stairway
disappears into a hidden room or enclosed space; rather than continuing
upward into infinity it leads to, or perhaps, in view of the work's
title, descends from another level. Where then do we find its
intimations of infinity? Here, another key identifier of the Baroque is
helpful: allegory. John Rupert Martin speaks of the Baroque's
'innate tendency' to allegorise, 'concealed beneath'
its naturalistic exterior (7). In allegorical terms, there is one trope
associated with the Baroque that goes unmentioned by Freeman
Bentley's commentators but seems eminently applicable to her work:
folding. For the philosopher, Gilles Deleuze with whom this idea is
associated, there is little point in seeking an essence of the Baroque,
like an art historian eager to categorise or periodise; better by far to
consider how it operates. It works, he suggests, by endlessly producing
folds (8).
The concept of the fold is the means by which Deleuze seeks to
trouble the simple dichotomy between inside and outside, surface and
depth, appearance and essence, since it presents the enigmatic
possibility that the one is simply a fold of the other. Deleuze's
cryptic way of pictorializing such foldings is a two-tiered Baroque
building. The lower floor is steeped in the material world, while the
upper chamber is entirely enclosed. This upper level designates the
incorporeal, immaterial or (dare we say) spiritual aspect of experience.
On the one hand, it differentiates between public and private realms. On
the other hand, at least for Deleuze, this model is a picture of the
relations between the material, sensing body and the soul. Equally, we
can say that the lower level is related to the exterior facade, evoking
the gravity, exuberance and complexity of the physical world; the upper
level is 'a weightless, closed interiority' (9), indicating
the levity, grace and harmony of spiritual elevation. Crucially, rather
than constituting two distinct worlds, Deleuze proposes each to be
inseparable from the other, 'by dint of a presence of the upper in
the lower. The upper floor is folded over the lower floor. One is not
acting upon the other, but one belongs to the other, in a sense of a
double belonging' (10). Inevitably a theological reading will
translate this hierarchy of levels into the material and spiritual,
secular and sacred, the Christian experience to be in but not of the
world, materially joined to it yet spiritually distinct from it. For
Freeman Bentley, longing is the name of the fold that stiches together
these two realms. As such, she says, the staircase stands 'as a
physical representation of desire, of the search for fulfillment'
(11). If the concept of the fold is, then, a device that separates and
joins, articulating the relations between visible and invisible,
material and spiritual, in purely architectural terms it is well
represented by a staircase, which connects not only separate rooms but
separate levels. Indeed, in Anthony Vidler's analysis of this
deleuzian theme he fortuitously writes that the two floors of the
'Baroque House' are 'joined by a stair of infinite
folds' (12).
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Harbison inventively described the many lives of the Baroque beyond
its 17th-century origins, finding influences and characteristic traits
of the Baroque in modern forms of art and architecture. In
Deleuze's idiosyncratic vision these hybridisations are envisioned
as foldings, one thing folding into another. As such, the metaphysical
lesson of the Baroque is a movement away from the Cartesian divisibility
of body and soul, towards a notion of the fundamental inseparability of
phenomena (13). However eccentric this reading may be (and Harbison for
one treats it so), with Descent in mind the notion of the fold rather
neatly complements Freeman Bentley's associations of her work with
a baroque sensibility. In the painterly materiality of her works depth
if vision is achieved by an infolding of their many layers, 'fold
after fold', as Deleuze would say.
(1.) Colin Perry, Florence Trust Summer Exhibition Catalogue, 2011,
unpaginated.
(2.) Helen Hills (ed.), Rethinking the Baroque, Farnham: Ashgate,
2011, p. 66.
(3.) Robert Harbison, Reflections on Baroque, London: Reaktion
Books, 2000, p. 217.
(4.) Heinrich Wolfflin, Renaissance and Baroque, London: Collins,
1964, p. 38.
(5.) Ben Quash, Found Theology: History, Imagination and the Holy
Spirit, London: Bloomsbury, 2013, p. 281-282.
(6.) Wolfflin, cited in Anthony Vidler, Warped Space: Art,
Architecture, and Anxiety in Modern Culture, Cambridge, MA and London:
The MIT Press, 2001, p. 90.
(7.) John Rupert Martin, 'The Baroque from the Point of View
of the Art Historian', The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
vol. 14, no. 2, 1955, p. 166. An obvious example might be the vanitas
image particularly associated with Dutch 17th-century painting. This
play between naturalistic form and allegorical content is a
distinguishing characteristic of the Baroque.
(8.) Gilles Deleuze, The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque, London: The
Athlone Press, 1993, p. 3.
(9.) Deleuze, The Fold, p. 29.
(10.) Deleuze, The Fold, p. 119. This distinction of two worlds is,
of course, one we associate with the Platonic tradition, with its
division of reality into Idea and Appearance. According to Deleuze, in
the Platonic model 'The world was thought to have an infinite
number of floors, with a stairway that descends and ascends, with each
step lost in the upper order of the One and disintegrated in the ocean
of the multiple. [...] But the Baroque contribution par excellence is a
world with only two floors', separated and joined by a fold
(Deleuze, The Fold, p. 29).
(11.) Anna Freeman Bentley, Investigating the Shadows, ACE/ASK
Artist's Talk, King's College London, 2 February 2015.
(12.) Vidler, Warped Space, p. 233.
(13.) If this Deleuzian fold seems to lack theological
justification we should note that Deleuze himself draws upon the
theology of Nicholas de Cusa and Giordano Bruno in identifying three
capacities of the fold. The triad of complicatio, explicatio and
implicatio is a trinity of folds and foldings: of enfolding
(complicatio), unfolding (explicatio) and infolding (implicatio), a
reading clearly referencing the pli or fold at the heart of each term.
Jonathan Koestle-Cate teaches at Goldsmiths College, London and is
on the editorial board of A&C
Descent is at Chichester Cathedral 10 April--12 June 2015.
A monograph of the artist was published this year by Anomie, priced
20[pounds sterling].