James Schiffer (ed.), Twelfth Night: New Critical Essays.
Selleck, Nancy
James Schiffer (ed.), Twelfth Night: New Critical Essays. New York:
Routledge, 2011.
This volume of essays on Twelfth Night offers a range of approaches
to the play, from a reassessment of key editorial puzzles, to
explorations of the plays social and intellectual contexts, to
significant instances of its performance history. Two especially rich
essays elaborate the ways early modern theories of the faculties and the
passions inform the language and action of Twelfth Night. There are also
intriguing pairings of essays on topics such as exoticism and
masculinity, with one essay analyzing the issue in the text and the next
exploring it in specific productions. This back-and-forth between
literary and theatrical criticism succeeds in raising interesting
questions about the relationship between performance and scholarship as
complementary modes of interpreting Shakespeare.
Schiffer's introduction gives an overview of the intertwining
history of criticism and performance of Twelfth Night through four
centuries, citing some of the most notable commentaries of each kind and
demonstrating their relatedness. Much of this swift-moving "long
view" provides food for further thought--for instance, about
changing responses to the play's female roles on the part of
producers as well as scholars. And Schiffer's lucid accounts of
"twentieth-century revolutions" and "postmodern
dissonance" in the evolving understanding of Twelfth Night would be
especially beneficial for graduate students and advanced undergraduates.
An illuminating essay by Patricia Parker takes up a variety of ways
in which editors of Twelfth Night have tended to obscure what Parker
calls "the ambiguous, portmanteau, or polysemous quality" of
the 1623 Folio text (58). Sir Toby's malapropisms are a case in
point, through which Parker argues for a more intentional confusion in
the text--a drunken multiplicity of meanings which many editors wrongly
try to simplify. She also suggests an important new reading of
Viola's use of the term "eunuch" early in the play, one
that attends to the "multiple resonances of its early modern
meanings" (58). Subsequent essays in the collection also emphasize
the early modern meanings of the play's terms, as in Bruce
Smith's discussion of "fancy" as a faculty that (contrary
to modern assumptions) connects rather than separates speech and sense.
In this reading, "fancy" constitutes a creative capacity
that's always in play and that leads not to "binary
possibilities" but to the strangeness of early modern sexuality
(65, 78). Similarly, David Schalkwyk starts with the early modern sense
of "passions" (as opposed to the modern "emotions"),
which captures "something suffered by the soul rather than moving
outward--'emoted'-from within" (81). Schalkwyk's
powerful reading finds competing discourses of the passions within the
play: Orsino's humoral discourse is contradicted by the play's
larger portrayal of the passion of love as "dedicated behavior and
action" (89).
Laurie Osborne also finds a debate about love within the text of
Twelfth Night. Through Cesario's extravagant love, which belongs to
the Renaissance ideal of male amity, Shakespeare implicitly challenges
Montaigne's contention that women cannot participate in that
highest form of friendship (110). The focus on gender continues in a
pair of essays on masculinity, in which Goran Stanivukovic suggests
Shakespeare is rewriting prose romances as part of a "shift from
chivalric to romantic masculinity" (118) and Marcela Kostihova
studies the politics of performing Twelfth Night--in particular, of
staging the relationship between Antonio and Sebastian--in the
post-communist Czech Republic.
Another group of essays turns to the topic of exoticism. Arguing
against the commonplace that Illyria represented the unknown for
Shakespeare's audience, Elizabeth Pentland surveys a range of
sixteenth-century texts to show that it was not just "a place of
lyricism, illusion, and exotic fantasy," but was fairly well known
"as an ancient kingdom with a long and fascinating history of
piracy, resistance to Rome, and female rule" (163). Exploring the
figure of the stranger, Catherine Lisak contends that the play
rehabilitates the notion of strangeness, cancelling the
"Anglo-foreign dichotomy" and merging "we and they ...
communally and morphologically into a complex state of being"
(182). Nathalie Rivere de Carles's essay on staging the exotic is
more tantalizing than successful in describing the scenic elements of
recent productions--for instance, when she refers to "a horizontal
stage tempted by verticality" without any further explanation or
description of the stage design in question. (Unfortunately, this essay
also contains a number of misquotations from the play.) More satisfying
is Christa Jansohn's account of German productions of Twelfth
Night, which offers thicker descriptions of the stagings she discusses,
and also introduces many interesting ideas and problems of performance
itself--including the "recent tendency of contemporary theatre to
replace traditional character concepts [with] visual appeals"
(212).
Two intriguing essays toward the end of the collection focus on the
play's relation to social hierarchies* Ivo Kamps explores its
representation of social class in the context of festive comedy,
entertaining the idea that Malvolio too may be a figure of
"Misrule" who ultimately suggests a more permanent possibility
of social change than the "safetyvalve" model of C. L. Barber.
Perhaps, Kamps muses, the play's ending suggests "that the
rise of commoners like Malvolio cannot be stemmed"; Shakespeare may
be asking his audience "to see the old madness as the new
sanity" (241). On the other hand, Jennifer Vaught's essay
connecting and comparing Twelfth Night with the post-Civil War New
Orleans traditions of Carnival which she argues arose out of
"nostalgia for a rigidly hierarchical culture"--shows that
Misrule "can also be appropriated for conservative, elitist, and
repressive purposes" (250). Her analysis of the Twelfth Night
Revels extends our sense of the play's contexts as well as the
notion of performance important to this volume* Introducing the Epiphany
traditions with an astute discussion of Carnival, Vaught's essay
would also be well suited to an advanced undergraduate audience.
Such is the case with most of the essays in this lively and
suggestive collection, which ends with Cynthia Lewis's amusing and
salutary cautions about the unsolved mysteries of Twelfth Night. Despite
the "profuse epiphanies" of the play's ending, our full
understanding is frustrated by deferred information, narrative gaps, and
lack of complete resolution. As with an unsolved crime, "the truth
is out there, but ... it escapes human apprehension" (261,268).
Reviewed by Nancy Selleck, University of Massachusetts Lowell